← Latest papers
⚛️ general relativity

Cosmology: 100 years after A. A. Friedmann

This paper commemorates the centenary of A. A. Friedmann's pioneering cosmological models while highlighting how his work was suppressed and forgotten in the USSR from the 1930s to the 1960s due to ideological opposition against the concept of an evolving universe.

Original authors: A. F. Zakharov

Published 2026-07-14
📖 6 min read🧠 Deep dive

Original authors: A. F. Zakharov

Original paper dedicated to the public domain under CC0 1.0 (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

Imagine the history of science as a giant, cosmic game of "Telephone." In this game, a brilliant message gets passed from person to person, but sometimes, the message gets whispered, distorted, or even silenced entirely because the person holding the phone is afraid to speak up. This paper, written by Alexander F. Zakharov, tells the story of how the most important message about our Universe—the idea that it is expanding and had a beginning—got lost in the Soviet Union for about thirty years, and how it was finally found again.

The Cosmic "Who's Who" and the Missing Link

The story starts with Alexander Friedmann, a Russian mathematician who, in the 1920s, did the math to show that the Universe isn't a static, unchanging thing. He proved that the Universe could be expanding, shrinking, or changing shape. Think of Friedmann as the guy who first realized the balloon is inflating, not just sitting there.

But here's the twist: In the Soviet Union, a group of "ideological referees" (philosophers and government officials) decided that Friedmann's idea was dangerous. Why? Because if the Universe had a beginning, it sounded too much like the religious story of "Creation" from the Bible. The Soviet government was strictly atheistic, so they banned the study of a Universe that had a "birth." They claimed the Universe must be infinite in time and space, forever and ever.

So, while the rest of the world was learning about the expanding Universe, Soviet scientists were told to pretend it didn't exist. They were even accused of being "idealists" (a bad word in their political system) if they talked about it. It was like a school banning the study of gravity because it reminded the principal too much of a story about apples falling from trees in a fairy tale.

The "Raman" Mystery: Did the West Cheat?

The paper also tackles a common complaint: "Did the West steal our discoveries?" A famous example is the discovery of "Raman scattering" (a type of light bouncing off molecules). Russian scientists Landsberg and Mandelstam found it at the same time as the Indian scientist Raman. Raman got the Nobel Prize; the Russians didn't.

The author suggests this wasn't necessarily a conspiracy to cheat. Instead, it was a game of "who knows who." Raman had a team of famous scientists (like Niels Bohr) shouting his name to the Nobel Committee. The Russian scientists had fewer people in their corner. The paper argues that Russian scientists were often too shy or too busy to promote their own work to the international community. It wasn't that the West was unfair; it was that the Russians didn't play the promotion game as hard as their foreign colleagues.

The "Hot Universe" and the Secret Discovery

Fast forward to the 1940s and 50s. A scientist named George Gamow (who had left the USSR and was now a "persona non grata" in his home country) proposed that the Universe started as a super-hot, dense point and has been cooling down ever since. He predicted that there should be a faint "afterglow" of heat left over from that explosion, called the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB).

Here is the most exciting part of the story: Before the famous American duo Penzias and Wilson "discovered" this background radiation in 1965, a Soviet student named T. A. Shmaonov actually measured it in the mid-1950s at the Pulkovo Observatory!

Shmaonov found a temperature of about 4 ± 3 K (Kelvin). But here's the tragedy: His boss, a brilliant scientist named Khaikin, knew that mentioning Gamow's theory was dangerous. If they said, "Hey, we found the heat left over from the Big Bang," they would be accused of supporting religious creation stories. So, Khaikin told Shmaonov to publish the numbers but not to explain what they meant. They buried the discovery in a technical journal that no one read, and they didn't mention Gamow. It was like finding a treasure map but being too scared to tell anyone where the gold is.

The "Big Bang" and the Priest

Another key character is Georges Lemaître, a Belgian priest and physicist. He was the one who really pushed the "Big Bang" idea (which he called the "Primeval Atom"). Because he was a priest, Soviet ideologists used this to say, "See? This theory is just a religious trick invented by the Pope!" They claimed Lemaître only came up with the idea because the Pope asked him to. This was a lie, but it was a very effective lie that kept Soviet scientists from studying the topic for decades.

The Great Un-Banning

The silence finally broke in 1963. A group of brave Soviet physicists, including the famous Ya. B. Zeldovich, stood up and said, "Enough!" They pointed out that the philosophers didn't understand the math and that the experiments (like the atomic bomb) proved Einstein's theories right. They declared that Friedmann's work was a masterpiece of Soviet science and that the "expanding Universe" was a fact, not a religious myth.

The paper concludes with a sad but honest truth: The reason Russian scientists didn't get as many Nobel Prizes as they deserved wasn't because the world was ignoring them. It was because they were often too afraid to speak up, too busy fighting internal battles, or too shy to promote their own heroes. As the author notes, the biggest obstacle to recognizing Russian genius was often the Russians themselves.

The Bottom Line

The paper doesn't claim to have discovered a new law of physics. Instead, it acts like a historian digging through old files to say: "Hey, we forgot to give credit to our own people, and we let fear stop us from understanding the Universe for 30 years."

  • What is proven? Friedmann's math was correct. Shmaonov measured the background radiation before the Americans. The Soviet government did ban these ideas for political reasons.
  • What is argued against? The idea that the West systematically stole Russian discoveries. The paper suggests the real culprit was a lack of self-promotion and internal fear.
  • How sure are we? The author is very sure about the historical facts (dates, names, quotes from memos) but suggests that the "discrimination" story is a myth created by the scientists' own inaction.

In the end, the Universe is expanding, the Big Bang happened, and the Soviet Union spent three decades pretending it didn't, all because they were afraid of a priest's idea. It's a reminder that in science, the truth is like a balloon: you can try to hold it down, but eventually, it will pop up and float away.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →