← Latest papers
📄 social_science

Curiosity, feedback orientation, musical self-regulated learning and later well- being during examinations: a three-wave prospective study

This three-wave prospective study of undergraduate music majors reveals that multidimensional curiosity fosters feedback orientation, which in turn promotes musical self-regulated learning, ultimately leading to a modest positive increase in well-being during examinations.

Original authors: Suxing Liu, Jie Zhang

Published 2026-09-04
📖 4 min read☕ Coffee break read

Original authors: Suxing Liu, Jie Zhang

Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

Music lessons often end before the real work begins. A student plays a piece, receives a teacher's comment on their phrasing or intonation, and then walks away to a practice room alone. In that quiet space, the student faces a choice: do they ignore the advice, or do they figure out how to turn that comment into a new strategy? This gap between hearing feedback and acting on it is where learning happens, or fails to happen. Researchers have long known that students need to be open to criticism to learn, and they need to be organized enough to practice effectively. But a new study asks what drives that initial openness. It looks at curiosity—not just as a general love of learning, but as a specific set of traits that might make a student eager to engage with a teacher's critique. The study also tracks whether this chain of events, from curiosity to practice, eventually makes a student feel better about their college life.

The researchers followed 600 undergraduate music students in Henan Province, China, over three weeks surrounding a natural examination period. They wanted to see if different types of curiosity predicted how ready a student was to accept feedback, and if that readiness led to better self-directed practice. They also checked if these habits influenced the students' overall well-being later on. The study measured five specific kinds of curiosity: the joy of exploring new things, the frustration felt when information is missing, the ability to tolerate stress, the thrill of seeking intense experiences, and the interest in other people's perspectives. These were measured before the students received their exam feedback. A week later, the students reported how much they valued feedback and how well they regulated their own practice. A final survey a week after that measured their satisfaction and sense of connection to their college experience.

The results showed a clear path from curiosity to action. Every type of curiosity measured was linked to a stronger willingness to engage with feedback. Students who were more curious in any of these five ways were more likely to see feedback as useful and to feel responsible for acting on it. This relationship was particularly strong for students who enjoyed seeking out intense or challenging experiences; they were the most eager to engage with evaluative information. Once a student was ready to accept feedback, they were also more likely to engage in self-regulated learning. This means they were better at setting goals, organizing their practice materials, monitoring their progress, and asking for help when needed. The study found that being open to feedback was a strong predictor of these organized practice habits.

However, the link between these learning habits and long-term happiness was more modest. While students who practiced with self-regulation reported slightly higher well-being during their exams, the effect was small. The study suggests that while curiosity and good study habits are vital for the immediate task of learning music, they are only one part of what makes a student feel good about their college life. A student's overall well-being depends on many other factors, such as their relationships, health, and general satisfaction with their school, which are not captured by a single feedback loop. The researchers also noted that curiosity itself had a direct, stronger link to well-being than the learning habits did, suggesting that curious students might simply be happier people regardless of their specific study techniques.

The study clarifies that being ready to hear feedback and actually doing the work to improve are two distinct steps. A student can be very open to a teacher's advice but still struggle to turn that advice into a concrete plan. Conversely, a student might have a great plan for practice but lack the curiosity to seek out or value new information. The research shows that curiosity acts as a spark that lights the fire of engagement, making the feedback worth the student's attention. That attention then fuels the engine of self-regulated practice. But the journey from a single practice session to a happy, fulfilled college experience is long and complex. The study confirms that in the specific, high-pressure world of music exams, curiosity helps students bridge the gap between a teacher's comment and their own independent work, even if it does not solve every challenge of student life.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →