← Latest papers
📄 earth science

Environmental Baseline Assessment of Phthalate Pollution in Water and Soil Within the Vicinity of Ibeju-Lekki Area of Lagos State, Nigeria

This study reveals significant spatial heterogeneity and localized hotspots of phthalate contamination in the soil and water of Ibeju-Lekki, Lagos, driven by nearby petroleum infrastructure, with specific sites like SS9A and UW17A exhibiting extreme pollution levels that necessitate urgent monitoring and source control.

Original authors: Michael Olufemi Dosunmu, Gregory Olufemi Adewuyi

Published 2026-09-22
📖 4 min read☕ Coffee break read

Original authors: Michael Olufemi Dosunmu, Gregory Olufemi Adewuyi

Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). ✨ This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

In the coastal stretch of Lagos State, Nigeria, a massive industrial transformation is underway. Here, near the Atlantic Ocean, a new oil refinery is rising within the Lekki Free Trade Zone, promising to reshape the region's energy landscape. Yet, where heavy industry grows, the environment often pays a hidden price. Chemicals used to make plastics flexible and durable, known as phthalates, are a common byproduct of modern manufacturing. These substances do not stay locked inside the products they help create; over time, they can leak out, seeping into the soil and washing into nearby waterways. Because these chemicals can disrupt the natural hormonal systems of living things, scientists watch them closely. When a new industrial complex is built in a sensitive coastal area, the question is not just whether these chemicals are present, but where they are hiding, how much of them exists, and whether the local soil and water are beginning to carry a heavy burden of contamination.

Researchers from the University of Ibadan set out to answer these questions for the Ibeju-Lekki area, specifically focusing on the ground and water surrounding the new refinery. They treated the area like a landscape being mapped for the first time, collecting samples from various spots during both the rainy and dry seasons to see if the weather changed the picture. To ensure they were measuring the impact of the new industry and not just natural background levels, they also took samples from a nearby community called Olorogbo, which served as a quiet reference point. In the laboratory, they used a powerful instrument called a gas chromatograph-mass spectrometer, which acts like a highly sensitive scanner, to separate and identify the specific types of phthalate chemicals hidden within the soil and water.

The investigation revealed that the pollution was not spread evenly across the landscape; instead, it was concentrated in specific, intense hotspots. In the soil, one particular location, identified as SS9A, stood out dramatically. Here, the concentration of a specific chemical called dibutyl phthalate reached 19.31 milligrams per kilogram. This single spot showed a level of contamination so high that it was nearly five hundred times greater than the natural background level for that chemical. While other soil samples showed lower or moderate levels, this one location suggested a very specific and powerful source of pollution, likely from nearby waste or runoff. The data also showed that some soil samples were chemically very similar to one another, suggesting they shared the same source of contamination, while others were completely different, pointing to distinct environmental conditions or pollution events.

The picture in the water was even more striking. While many of the water samples showed almost no detectable traces of these chemicals, two locations told a different story. One underground water sample, labeled UW17A, contained levels of contamination that were staggering. This single spot held a massive amount of bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate and benzyl butyl phthalate, two chemicals often used in plastics and medical equipment. The concentration of bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate in this water was so high that it created a contamination score nearly fifteen thousand times greater than the natural background level. Another surface water spot, SW9A, also showed elevated levels, though not as extreme as the underground site. The strong statistical links between certain surface and underground water samples suggested that the pollution was moving through the ground, connecting the water above with the water below, likely driven by a common source or the natural flow of the water table.

The study concludes that while the pollution is not uniform across the entire region, it is severe in specific pockets. The soil at SS9A and the water at UW17A represent critical areas where the environment has absorbed a heavy load of these industrial chemicals. The researchers found that the contamination was driven by just a few specific types of phthalates rather than a mix of many different ones, which helps point toward the likely origin of the pollution. These findings provide a crucial baseline, a snapshot of the environment before the industrial zone fully matures. They serve as a warning that without careful monitoring and control, the rapid development of this coastal area could lead to lasting damage to the local soil and water, posing risks to the ecosystems and communities that depend on them.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →