Evaluating the blue carbon benefits of aligning Canada’s biodiversity conservation and climate change mitigation targets
This study presents a national assessment framework for Canada's blue carbon ecosystems, revealing significant carbon stocks and sequestration potential while demonstrating that expanding their protection to 30% by 2030 could yield substantial cumulative climate mitigation benefits by 2050.
Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer
The ocean is often thought of as a vast, open space where carbon dioxide simply drifts away, but beneath the waves lies a quiet, powerful system for storing heat-trapping gases. Just as forests on land act as giant sponges for carbon, the seabed and coastal plants perform a similar, though often overlooked, role. These underwater ecosystems, ranging from the grassy meadows that sway in shallow bays to the dark, muddy floors of the continental shelf, capture carbon from the air and lock it away in their soils and sediments. Scientists call these "blue carbon" systems. While the world has long focused on protecting forests to fight climate change, the potential of these marine environments to do the same is only recently gaining attention. The challenge now is to understand exactly how much carbon these waters hold, where it is located, and whether protecting these areas can help nations meet their climate goals without sacrificing the health of marine life.
A team of researchers from across Canada and beyond has taken a major step toward answering these questions by creating the first comprehensive map of the country's blue carbon assets. Canada possesses one of the longest coastlines in the world, stretching from the Atlantic to the Pacific and deep into the Arctic, yet until now, no one had a clear picture of how much carbon was stored in its marine soils or how much was being captured each year. The researchers set out to fill this gap by combining existing data with new models to estimate the total carbon stored in the top layer of the ocean floor and the rate at which coastal plants like kelp, seagrass, and marsh grasses pull carbon from the atmosphere. They focused on four key types of ecosystems: the bare, muddy seabeds that cover the vast continental shelves, the tidal marshes found along the coast, the underwater seagrass meadows, and the towering kelp forests that act as a source of carbon for the deep ocean.
The results reveal a massive, hidden reservoir of climate-stabilizing power. The team estimated that the top 30 centimeters of Canada's marine soils and sediments hold approximately 10,952.5 teragrams of carbon. To put this in perspective, nearly all of this carbon—about 99 percent—is stored in the bare seabed sediments along the continental edges, rather than in the more famous coastal plants. While the plants themselves store less total carbon, they are active workers, pulling an additional 7.7 teragrams of carbon out of the air every year. A significant portion of this comes from kelp forests, which act as a conveyor belt, moving carbon from the surface down into the deep ocean or transforming it into a form that stays dissolved in the water for centuries. The study also highlighted that these assets are not evenly distributed; the muddy shelves off the Atlantic and Pacific coasts hold the bulk of the stored carbon, while the tidal marshes in the Hudson Bay region are particularly rich in their own right.
Despite the sheer size of these carbon stores, the researchers found that they are largely unprotected. Currently, only a small fraction of Canada's most carbon-rich areas fall within the strictest categories of marine protected areas. For instance, less than one percent of the high-carbon seabed sediments are under strict protection, and only about 15 percent of tidal marshes and 3 percent of seagrass meadows are similarly safeguarded. This leaves the majority of Canada's blue carbon vulnerable to human activities like bottom trawling, coastal development, and dredging, which can disturb the seabed and release the stored carbon back into the atmosphere. The study suggests that the current approach to marine conservation, which has historically focused on biodiversity and fisheries, has largely missed the opportunity to protect these critical climate assets.
The researchers then modeled what would happen if Canada expanded its marine protections to meet a new global target of protecting 30 percent of its marine areas by 2030, specifically prioritizing the areas richest in carbon. Their simulations suggest that reaching this goal could secure a massive amount of climate benefit. By protecting these areas and effectively stopping the habitat loss that currently threatens them, Canada could avoid the release of approximately 59.9 teragrams of carbon dioxide equivalent by the year 2050. Furthermore, keeping these ecosystems intact would maintain their ability to continue removing carbon from the atmosphere, adding another 47.1 teragrams of carbon dioxide equivalent in ongoing removal benefits. In total, this alignment of conservation and climate goals could provide a cumulative mitigation benefit of nearly 107 teragrams of carbon dioxide equivalent by 2050.
However, the study is careful to note that simply drawing a line on a map to create a protected area is not a magic solution. The climate benefits depend entirely on whether the rules within those areas actually stop the activities that cause harm. For the vast seabed sediments, this means preventing destructive fishing gear from scraping the ocean floor. For coastal marshes and seagrass beds, it requires managing a complex web of threats, including pollution and coastal development. For kelp forests, the challenge is even greater, as they face threats from warming waters and marine heatwaves that cannot be solved by protection alone. The researchers emphasize that while the potential is significant, realizing it requires specific, active management to ensure these ecosystems remain healthy and intact.
This work provides a clear roadmap for how Canada can integrate its climate and biodiversity goals. By identifying exactly where the most valuable carbon stores are located, policymakers can design marine protected areas that serve a dual purpose: safeguarding the unique creatures that call these waters home while simultaneously locking away carbon to slow global warming. The study demonstrates that protecting the ocean is not just about saving fish or whales; it is also a practical, measurable strategy for fighting climate change. As nations around the world look for ways to meet their climate targets, the evidence from Canada suggests that the ocean floor and its coastal plants offer a powerful, yet underutilized, tool for a more stable future.
Drowning in papers in your field?
Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.