STOPP/START Criteria in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Colombia: A Cross-Sectional Study
This cross-sectional study of 434 Colombian patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus reveals a high prevalence (71.7%) of potentially inappropriate medications and therapeutic omissions, particularly among those with rheumatologic comorbidities, highlighting significant opportunities to improve prescribing quality in this population.
Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer
Type 2 diabetes is a condition where the body struggles to manage blood sugar, a problem that grows more complex as people age. For older adults living with this disease, the challenge often lies not just in controlling sugar levels, but in managing a web of other health issues like high blood pressure, heart disease, and joint pain. Treating all these conditions at once requires many different medicines, and while each drug has a purpose, the sheer number of pills can sometimes create new problems. Doctors rely on specific checklists to ensure that every medication a patient takes is truly necessary and safe, while also making sure no vital treatment has been overlooked. These tools help distinguish between helpful care and care that might do more harm than good, a distinction that becomes critical when a patient is taking a dozen different prescriptions daily.
In Colombia, a team of researchers set out to see how well these safety checklists were being applied to older adults with type 2 diabetes. They looked at the medical records of 434 patients, all aged 65 or older, who had been diagnosed with the condition and were receiving care through a major health insurance provider. The researchers used two established screening tools to review the patients' medication lists. One tool, known as STOPP, acts like a filter to spot medicines that might be inappropriate or dangerous for an older person, such as a drug that causes confusion or a pill that is no longer needed. The other tool, called START, works in the opposite direction, scanning the records to see if a patient is missing a treatment that they clearly need, like a stomach protector for someone taking painkillers. By applying these rules to real-world data, the team aimed to uncover how often these prescribing errors or omissions were happening in their local community.
The study revealed that the situation was more widespread than many might expect. More than two-thirds of the patients reviewed had at least one issue flagged by these screening tools. Specifically, about half of the patients were taking a medication that could be considered inappropriate for their age or condition, while nearly the same number were missing a treatment that would have been beneficial. The most common problem found was the use of aspirin for preventing heart disease in people who had never had a heart attack or stroke; current medical guidance suggests this is often unnecessary and carries risks for older adults. On the other side of the ledger, the most frequent omission was the failure to prescribe stomach-protecting drugs for patients who were regularly taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, a common class of pain relievers that can irritate the stomach lining.
The researchers also discovered that the likelihood of these issues appearing was not random. Patients who were dealing with a heavier burden of other health conditions, particularly those involving their joints, nerves, or heart, were significantly more likely to have inappropriate prescriptions or missing treatments. Similarly, the number of medications a person took played a major role; those on five or more different drugs were much more prone to having at least one inappropriate prescription than those on fewer. The study did not find that age or gender alone were the deciding factors, but rather that the complexity of a patient's overall health picture drove the risk.
These findings paint a clear picture of a population where the complexity of managing multiple chronic diseases often leads to gaps in care or the use of medicines that are no longer the best choice. The high rate of issues identified suggests that there is a significant opportunity to improve how medicines are prescribed for older adults with diabetes in Colombia. By using these screening tools to review patient records, doctors could potentially catch these errors before they lead to hospital visits or other complications. The study does not claim to have solved the problem, but it provides a detailed map of where the problems exist, highlighting that for many patients, a closer look at their medication list could lead to safer and more effective care.
Drowning in papers in your field?
Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.