Beyond the Bunsen burner: science teacher portrayals in visual media as cultural artifacts shaping public understanding of science education
Drawing on Wartofsky's artifact theory and an integrated theoretical framework, this paper analyzes science teacher portrayals in visual media from 1990 to 2023 to reveal how the "heroic exception" trope and evolving boundary figures create a significant representation-reality gap that shapes public understanding, expectations, and support for science education.
Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer
We often form our ideas about what a job is like not from reading a job description, but from watching movies and television. When we see a character on screen, we absorb a story about who they are, what they do, and what society expects of them. This is especially true for science teachers. For decades, visual media has presented a specific image of the person standing in front of a chemistry or biology class. These images are not just entertainment; they act as cultural objects that shape how the public understands science education. They tell us what a teacher should look like, what kind of problems they should solve, and what their daily life involves. When millions of people watch these stories, they begin to form a shared set of expectations about the profession, often without ever stepping foot in a real classroom.
A team of researchers from universities in Ukraine and Poland set out to examine these images. They asked a simple but profound question: how do the science teachers we see on screen differ from the real people who teach science every day? To answer this, they looked at eight popular films and television series released between 1990 and 2023. The list included well-known titles such as Breaking Bad, The Walking Dead, October Sky, and the more recent Lessons in Chemistry. The researchers treated these stories as cultural artifacts—human-made objects that carry and transmit meaning. They analyzed how these stories were constructed, how the characters navigated the space between being a scientific expert and a social person, and, perhaps most importantly, what the stories left out.
The study found that visual media consistently portrays science teachers as "heroic exceptions." In almost every story, the science teacher is shown demonstrating extraordinary skill, but only when a crisis occurs. A character might be a brilliant chemist who saves a group from a zombie plague, or a teacher who uses their knowledge to explain chemical principles through a cooking show, or a teacher who supports a student's rocketry ambitions against institutional barriers. In these moments, their expertise is the key to survival or success. However, the stories almost never show the teacher doing the actual work of teaching. The routine, unglamorous parts of the job—planning lessons, grading papers, managing student behavior, attending meetings, or dealing with administrative paperwork—are systematically absent. The researchers argue that by showing only the dramatic moments and hiding the daily grind, these stories create a false impression. They suggest that a science teacher's value lies only in their ability to solve a crisis, rather than in the patient, incremental work of helping students learn over time.
This pattern of omission has a second effect: it makes the daily reality of teaching invisible. The researchers compared the scenes in these movies to data on how real science teachers actually spend their time. In reality, teachers spend a significant portion of their week on preparation, assessment, and administrative duties. In the movies, these activities simply do not exist. When a character teaches, they often appear to do it spontaneously, as if their knowledge alone is enough to fill the room. This absence is not just a storytelling shortcut; it shapes public perception. If people never see the hard work behind the scenes, they may assume that teaching requires little effort or that the "real" work is only what happens during a dramatic moment. This gap between what is shown and what is real can lead to unrealistic expectations for actual teachers and may even discourage people from entering the profession, as the job looks either impossibly heroic or strangely empty of daily substance.
The study also explored how these characters handle the tension between being a scientific expert and being a member of a community. In many older stories, the science teacher is portrayed as an outsider. Their deep knowledge of science makes them seem strange or distant from the students and colleagues around them. To be accepted, they often have to give up their scientific identity or use their knowledge in a way that has nothing to do with teaching, such as becoming a criminal or a survivalist. However, the researchers noticed a shift in more recent stories. Newer portrayals, particularly those from the 2020s, show characters who manage to be both experts and connected members of their community. These characters do not have to choose between their scientific knowledge and their social life. They show that it is possible to teach science in a way that respects the subject while also building genuine relationships with students. This evolution suggests that the cultural understanding of the role is slowly changing, moving away from the idea of the lonely genius toward a more integrated view of the teacher.
Ultimately, the researchers conclude that these stories do more than just entertain; they teach us what to expect from science education. By consistently highlighting crisis and hiding routine, and by often separating the expert from the community, visual media constructs a specific version of the science teacher that may not match reality. The study suggests that this mismatch matters. It influences how the public values teachers, how policies are made to support schools, and how students and future teachers imagine the profession. The researchers argue that to improve science education, we need to be aware of these stories. We need to recognize that the "heroic" teacher on screen is a cultural creation, not a reflection of the complex, hardworking, and often ordinary reality of the people who teach science in our schools. By understanding the difference between the artifact and the reality, we can begin to form a more accurate and supportive view of the profession.
Drowning in papers in your field?
Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.