← Latest papers
📄 medicine

Feasibility of the use of Group Interpersonal Psychotherapy in schools to treat depression among adolescents in Uganda. A qualitative study

This qualitative study in Uganda demonstrates that Group Interpersonal Psychotherapy (IPT-G) is a feasible and beneficial intervention for treating adolescent depression in school settings, provided that implementation challenges regarding scheduling and teacher workload are addressed through administrative support and flexibility.

Original authors: Elly Atuhumuza, Khamisi Musanje, Roscoe Kasujja, Jacquellyn Nambi Ssanyu, Andrew Fraker, Shakirah Nakalungi, Morris Ndeezi, Gerald M. Nsereko, Hilary M. Mukula, Sarah N. Gava, Racheal D. Nuwagaba, Kat
Published 2026-07-10
📖 5 min read🧠 Deep dive

Original authors: Elly Atuhumuza, Khamisi Musanje, Roscoe Kasujja, Jacquellyn Nambi Ssanyu, Andrew Fraker, Shakirah Nakalungi, Morris Ndeezi, Gerald M. Nsereko, Hilary M. Mukula, Sarah N. Gava, Racheal D. Nuwagaba, Kathryn Lovero, Catherine Carlson

Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

Imagine a school in Uganda as a bustling, crowded city where every student is a traveler carrying a heavy, invisible backpack. Sometimes, that backpack is filled with sadness, worry, or anger—what doctors call depression. For a long time, the only way to empty that backpack was to find a professional guide, but in many places, there are very few guides and too many travelers.

Enter a new idea: Group Interpersonal Psychotherapy (IPT-G). Think of this not as a solo journey with a guide, but as a "backpack swap party." Instead of one person talking to an expert, a group of friends sits in a circle, shares their stories, and helps each other figure out how to lighten their loads.

A team of researchers decided to test if this "backpack swap party" could work inside the school walls of Uganda. They didn't just guess; they went to five schools across two districts—one urban and one rural—and talked to 44 students and 9 teachers who had already tried it. They used a special checklist called "Bowen's framework" to see if the idea was actually doable.

Here is what they found, served up with a side of reality:

The Good News: A Safe Space to Unpack

The students who joined the groups said it was like finding a secret clubhouse. They described it as a "safe space" where they could spill their secrets without fear of being judged or having their stories told to others.

  • The Magic of Confidentiality: The kids loved the rule of keeping secrets. One student said, "We were able to talk truthfully with our friends, and they kept it a secret too." It was like having a group of guardians who promised, "What happens in the circle, stays in the circle."
  • Feeling Empowered: Before the groups, some kids were scared to speak up. Afterward, they felt like they had superpowers. One student said, "I didn't like sharing, but now... I feel empowered." They even started helping each other figure out how to handle sadness.
  • Better Grades and Moods: The teachers noticed a change, too. Students seemed to focus better in class. One student explained, "When I was in class, I used to overthink, but now I no longer do." Teachers saw kids managing their anger better and getting along more with parents and friends. It wasn't a magic spell that fixed everything instantly, but it suggested that when the heavy backpack got lighter, schoolwork became easier to carry.

The Bumpy Road: Why It's Hard to Fit In

However, the researchers were very clear: just because it works doesn't mean it's easy to fit into a busy school day. The paper explicitly does not rule out the idea of slotting this in; instead, it concludes that the program is feasible, but only if we are flexible and smart about how we do it.

  • The Schedule Clash: Schools in Uganda are like tightly packed suitcases; there is no extra room. When students went to the group, they sometimes missed class. One student regretted missing a lesson because the teacher had already finished marking books and gone home. The paper suggests that without a dedicated time, the program disrupts learning.
  • The "No" from Some Teachers: Not everyone was on board. Some teachers, who weren't part of the program, saw the groups as a nuisance. They discouraged kids from leaving class, asking, "You don't have time!" The researchers found that if the school leaders and teachers don't fully buy in, the program struggles.
  • The Resource Gap: The program needs a little bit of fuel to run. Teachers mentioned that kids might need a small treat, like a soda or a sweet, to feel motivated to come. But many schools are already struggling to pay for basic things. The paper notes that without extra resources, it might be hard for schools to keep the party going on their own.

The Verdict: It's Possible, But Needs a Map

So, is this a "solved problem"? No. The paper does not claim that this is a finished, perfect solution ready for every school tomorrow. Instead, the findings suggest that the idea is feasible—meaning it can work—but only if we are flexible and smart about how we do it.

The researchers point out three things that must happen for this to succeed:

  1. Respect the "Mental Health Hour": Uganda has a rule that schools should have a specific time on the timetable for mental health. The paper argues that if schools actually respect this time and don't use it for regular lessons, the groups can happen without stealing time from math or science.
  2. Get the Bosses on Board: The school principal and all the teachers need to understand why this matters. If the administration doesn't support it, the program might get stuck.
  3. A Dedicated Helper: The teachers are already working hard. The paper suggests that if possible, having one person whose only job is to run these groups (instead of a teacher who is also grading papers and managing the playground) would make a huge difference.

The Bottom Line

The study concludes that Group Interpersonal Psychotherapy is a feasible way to help teenagers in Uganda deal with depression, but it is not a "plug-and-play" fix. It's more like a delicate plant: it can grow in a school, but it needs the right soil (supportive teachers), the right time (a protected spot on the schedule), and a little bit of water (resources) to survive.

The paper explicitly states that while the program showed promise in helping kids manage anger, improve relationships, and even boost grades, it requires implementation flexibility to fit the crowded reality of Ugandan schools. Without these adjustments, the "backpack swap party" might get canceled by the bell. But with the right support, it could become a vital tool for many young travelers.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →