← Latest papers
📈 economics

Binance Leads, but Some Wallets Anticipate: Wallet-Level Cross-Venue Informed Flow in BTC Perpetual Futures

This paper demonstrates that while Binance leads Hyperliquid in BTC perpetual futures price discovery on average, a persistent minority of Hyperliquid wallets exhibit anticipatory informed flow that precedes price movements on the dominant centralized venue.

Original authors: Boon Chuan Lim

Published 2026-07-06
📖 4 min read☕ Coffee break read

Original authors: Boon Chuan Lim

Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

Imagine the world of cryptocurrency trading as a massive, bustling marketplace where everyone is trying to guess the future price of Bitcoin. In this market, there are two main types of shops:

  1. The Giant Department Store (Binance): This is a huge, centralized exchange. It has deep shelves, thousands of customers, and moves incredibly fast. Because it's so big, most people watch it to see what the "real" price is doing.
  2. The Open-Air Market Stall (Hyperliquid): This is a newer, on-chain venue. It's smaller and a bit slower, but here's the magic trick: everyone knows exactly who is buying and selling. You can see the specific "wallet" (like a digital ID) of every trader.

The Big Question

The researcher asked a simple question: Who is actually leading the dance?

Does the Giant Department Store (Binance) set the price, and does the Open-Air Market (Hyperliquid) just react to it? Or, are there some super-smart shoppers in the Open-Air Market who figure out the price before the Giant Department Store even moves?

The Findings: The General Rule

The Giant Department Store is the Boss.
When the researcher looked at the market as a whole, the answer was clear. Binance moves first. Hyperliquid follows.

  • The Analogy: Imagine a large crowd at a concert. If the person in the front row (Binance) stands up to cheer, the people behind them (Hyperliquid) usually stand up a split second later. The paper found that for the vast majority of the time, Binance sets the trend, and Hyperliquid copies it.

The Twist: The "Hidden Geniuses"

However, the researcher didn't just look at the crowd; they looked at individual people. This is where the story gets interesting.

While the average person in the Open-Air Market follows the Giant Store, the researcher found a small, persistent group of "hidden geniuses."

  • The Analogy: In that same concert crowd, there are a few people who don't wait for the front row to stand up. They have a secret radio or a sixth sense, and they stand up just before the front row does.
  • The Result: About 9% of the specific wallets on Hyperliquid were found to be "anticipators." They made trades that predicted the price movement on Binance before it actually happened there.

How Did They Prove It Wasn't Luck?

To make sure these "geniuses" weren't just lucky, the researcher split the data into two halves (like looking at the first half of the month and the second half).

  • The Test: They identified the top performers in the first half and checked if they were still the top performers in the second half.
  • The Outcome: Yes! The same group of wallets kept showing up as the "predictors." It wasn't a fluke; it was a consistent pattern. Even though they were a small minority, they were consistently ahead of the curve.

The Takeaway

The paper's main point is a lesson in looking deeper than averages:

  • At the Venue Level: Binance is the leader; Hyperliquid is the follower.
  • At the Wallet Level: Even though Hyperliquid is a "follower" venue on average, it is home to a persistent minority of traders who are actually leaders in terms of information.

In simple terms: The market usually moves in one direction, but if you look closely enough at the individual players, you can find a small group that knows the future a few seconds before everyone else does. The paper doesn't say how they know (it could be faster computers, better data, or just being very smart), only that they do know, and they do it consistently.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →