Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic bullectomy and partial pleurectomy for primary spontaneous pneumothorax in a resource-limited tertiary centre in the Gaza Strip: a retrospective observational study
This retrospective study of 136 patients in the Gaza Strip demonstrates that uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic bullectomy with pleurodesis is a feasible and effective treatment for primary spontaneous pneumothorax in resource-limited settings, yielding low complication and recurrence rates over a median 24-month follow-up, with partial pleurectomy potentially offering superior recurrence prevention compared to mechanical abrasion.
Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer
Air can sometimes find its way into the narrow space between the lung and the chest wall, causing the lung to collapse. When this happens without any injury or underlying disease, it is called a primary spontaneous pneumothorax. This condition most often strikes tall, young adults, and it is strongly linked to smoking. While a small collapse might heal on its own, a larger one usually requires a tube to be inserted to drain the air and let the lung re-inflate. If the air keeps leaking or if the lung refuses to expand, doctors must intervene surgically. The goal of surgery is to seal the leak and prevent the air from returning. For decades, the standard approach involved making several small cuts in the chest to insert a camera and instruments, a technique known as video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. More recently, surgeons have refined this to use just a single small opening, which reduces trauma and pain. However, most reports on this advanced, single-opening technique come from wealthy hospitals with abundant supplies. It remains unclear whether such delicate work can be performed safely in places where resources are scarce and supplies are often limited.
In a hospital in the Gaza Strip, a team of surgeons set out to see how this modern, single-opening surgery worked for patients with collapsed lungs under difficult conditions. They looked back at the records of 136 patients who underwent this procedure between 2017 and 2022 at Al-Shifa Medical Complex. The patients were mostly young men, with an average age of about 25 years, and the vast majority were smokers. Most had experienced their first episode of a collapsed lung, but the surgery was only performed because the initial treatment with a drainage tube had failed to make the lung expand again. A small number of patients had already suffered a recurrence and needed a second operation. The surgeons used a single small cut between the ribs to insert a camera and tools. Through this opening, they identified and removed the small air-filled blisters on the lung surface that were causing the leak. To stop the lung from collapsing again, they then performed a procedure to stick the lung to the chest wall. Some surgeons chose to remove a thin layer of the lining on the chest wall, while others simply rubbed the surface to create a rough texture that would encourage sticking. The choice between these two methods was left to the preference of the individual surgeon.
The results showed that this advanced surgery was entirely feasible even in a setting with severe resource constraints. The patients stayed in the hospital for a very short time, typically between one and three days, and the tube used to drain air was removed after about five days. Complications were rare. Only three patients developed a minor infection at the incision site, and there were no cases of severe bleeding, blood clots, or the need to convert the surgery into a larger, more invasive operation. No patients died as a result of the procedure. When the researchers checked on the patients over a median period of two years, they found that the lung had collapsed again on the same side in only two people. This represents a recurrence rate of just 1.5 percent, which is a very low number. Both of the patients who experienced a return of the problem had undergone the method where the surgeons rubbed the surface of the lung lining rather than removing a layer of it. In the group where a layer was removed, no one had a recurrence.
The study suggests that performing this delicate, single-opening surgery is possible and safe even in a resource-limited environment, offering a short recovery time and a low chance of the problem returning. While the data hints that removing a layer of the chest lining might be slightly more effective at preventing the lung from collapsing again compared to simply rubbing the surface, the researchers are careful to note that this finding is not yet proven. The decision of which method to use was made by the surgeons themselves rather than by a strict plan, and the number of patients who had a recurrence was very small. Therefore, this observation serves as a starting point for future questions rather than a final answer. What is clear, however, is that high-quality, minimally invasive thoracic surgery can be delivered successfully in challenging circumstances, providing a reliable solution for young patients facing a collapsed lung.
Drowning in papers in your field?
Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.