Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis Is Associated With Improved Rotational Stability but Not Superior Short-Term Patient-Reported Outcomes After Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Non-Athletic Patients
In non-athletic patients undergoing primary hamstring autograft ACL reconstruction, adding a lateral extra-articular tenodesis significantly improves postoperative rotational stability but does not lead to superior short-term patient-reported outcomes or anterior stability compared to isolated reconstruction.
Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer
The knee is a complex hinge that must do two very different jobs at once: it must stay solid when you stand or walk, and it must twist slightly when you change direction. When the anterior cruciate ligament, a crucial band of tissue inside the knee, tears, the joint often loses its ability to handle that twisting motion. Surgeons have long known how to repair the torn ligament to stop the knee from sliding forward, but a stubborn problem remains: even after a successful repair, many patients still feel a sense of instability when they pivot or turn. To fix this, some surgeons have begun adding a secondary procedure called a lateral extra-articular tenodesis. This involves taking a small strip of the strong band of tissue that runs along the outside of the thigh and anchoring it to the knee to act as an extra tether against rotation. While this technique has shown promise in young, high-level athletes, it is less clear whether the extra surgery is necessary for the average person who simply wants to return to a normal, active life without competitive sports.
A team of researchers in Turkey set out to answer this question by looking at the results of a specific group of patients who were not professional athletes. They reviewed the medical records of 83 individuals who had undergone primary reconstruction of the torn ligament using a tendon taken from their own hamstring muscles. The study focused on a population defined as non-athletic, meaning these were people whose daily activities involved recreation or work rather than competitive pivoting sports. The researchers divided these patients into two groups based on the surgery they received. One group, consisting of 43 people, received the standard reconstruction alone. The other group, made up of 40 people, received the standard reconstruction plus the additional lateral tether procedure. To ensure a fair comparison, the surgeons made sure the two groups were nearly identical in age, body weight, and the specific shape of their knee bones, and every operation was performed by the same highly trained surgeon using the exact same techniques and rehabilitation plans.
The results of the study revealed a clear difference in how the knees behaved mechanically. When the surgeons tested the patients' knees for rotational stability, the group that received the extra tether performed significantly better. Nearly all of them, 95 percent, showed no sign of the knee slipping or twisting abnormally during a specific physical test. In contrast, only about one-third of the patients who received the standard surgery alone showed the same level of stability. This confirmed that the additional procedure successfully tightened the knee against rotational forces. However, when the researchers looked at how well the knees resisted sliding forward, the two groups performed exactly the same. The extra tether did not make the knee more stable in a straight line; it only improved its ability to handle twisting.
Perhaps more surprisingly, the extra surgery did not lead to better feelings of recovery for the patients. The researchers asked the participants to rate their pain, function, and ability to return to work using several standard questionnaires. The scores for both groups were virtually identical. Patients in both groups reported similar levels of satisfaction, similar ability to return to their jobs, and similar rates of complications. The additional procedure did not cause more problems, but it also did not make the patients feel any better in the short term than those who had the standard surgery alone. Even the rate of the graft tearing again was similar between the two groups, though the number of patients was too small to draw a firm conclusion about long-term protection.
The study suggests that for non-athletic patients, adding the lateral tether to a ligament repair is a safe way to eliminate rotational looseness in the knee, but it does not necessarily translate into a better subjective experience for the patient in the first year after surgery. The researchers noted that because their study looked back at past records and involved a relatively small number of people, the findings are a strong suggestion rather than a final proof. They concluded that while the extra procedure fixes a specific mechanical issue, it may not be needed for everyone, particularly those whose daily lives do not demand extreme twisting forces. The decision to add this step remains a matter of surgical judgment, balancing the desire for perfect mechanical stability against the reality that patients often feel just as recovered without it.
Drowning in papers in your field?
Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.