Gendered digital divides: assessing eHealth literacy and health- information-seeking behaviors among young adults on Saint Martin Island, Bangladesh
This study reveals that while digital technologies offer potential health benefits for young adults on Saint Martin Island, Bangladesh, significant gendered disparities in eHealth literacy, privacy concerns, and access barriers limit their effectiveness, necessitating interventions that address both technological and socio-cultural factors to ensure equitable health outcomes.
Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer
In many parts of the world, the internet promises to bridge the gap between remote communities and essential health knowledge. The idea is simple: if a person can connect to the web, they can find answers to medical questions, understand symptoms, and perhaps even consult a doctor without traveling miles over difficult terrain. This concept relies on a skill set known as eHealth literacy. It is not just about having a smartphone or a data plan; it is the ability to find health information online, understand what it says, judge whether it is trustworthy, and use that knowledge to make decisions about one's own well-being. For decades, researchers have known that access to technology does not automatically mean equal access to its benefits. Men and women, people with different levels of education, and those living in different economic conditions often experience the digital world in vastly different ways. The question that remains is how these differences play out in the most isolated places, where a doctor might be a boat ride away and the only reliable source of information is a flickering mobile signal.
A team of researchers from the University of Dhaka set out to explore this exact scenario on Saint Martin's Island, a small coral island off the coast of Bangladesh. This community is geographically cut off from the mainland, with travel depending entirely on sea transport, which is often impossible during the monsoon season. The researchers wanted to understand how young adults living there use digital tools for health, and whether men and women experience this digital landscape differently. They focused on 433 young people between the ages of 18 and 35, interviewing them about their habits, their confidence in using the internet for medical advice, and the barriers they face. They combined these interviews with a deeper look at the personal stories of 25 community members to get a full picture of life on the island.
The study revealed a clear divide between men and women. On average, the young men on the island reported feeling much more confident in their ability to find and use online health information than the young women did. When asked to rate their skills, the men gave themselves higher marks. The researchers found that this gap was not just about who owned a phone, but about who could use it freely. Many women described having to share a device with a husband or a family member, which meant they could not search for sensitive health topics in private. They also faced a significant language barrier; a large majority of women reported that the difficulty of understanding English on health websites was a major obstacle, whereas men found this less of a problem. For both groups, the cost of data and slow internet speeds were frustrating realities, but the privacy and language hurdles were uniquely heavy for the women.
Perhaps the most surprising discovery was that having higher confidence in digital health skills did not always lead to safer choices. The researchers found that young people who felt more capable of using the internet for health were actually more likely to change their daily habits based on what they read online, which can be a positive thing. However, this same confidence was also linked to a higher likelihood of self-medicating—buying and taking medicine without a doctor's prescription. It suggests that when people feel they can find the answer themselves, they may skip the step of consulting a professional. Furthermore, those with higher digital literacy were not necessarily better at spotting fake news. In fact, the data showed that people who felt most confident in their online skills were also more likely to report believing in health misinformation they encountered on the web. This indicates that feeling capable of finding information is not the same as having the skill to verify if that information is true.
The study also highlighted how the islanders actually use the internet. It is not a replacement for doctors, but a supplement. When someone feels unwell, they often look up symptoms online first, but they almost always follow that up by asking a trusted doctor, a pharmacist, or a family member before taking action. The internet serves as a starting point for a conversation, not the final word. The researchers noted that for the women, the lack of privacy was a critical issue. If a woman cannot search for information about a sensitive health problem without her family knowing, she is less likely to use the internet for that purpose at all. This creates a situation where the technology exists, but the social environment prevents half the population from using it effectively.
The findings from Saint Martin's Island suggest that simply giving people phones or internet access is not enough to solve health inequalities. The researchers concluded that for digital health to work in isolated communities, it must address the specific barriers that prevent people from using it safely. This means creating health information in local languages, ensuring that people have private ways to access the internet, and teaching everyone how to spot unreliable information. The study shows that digital tools can be a powerful bridge to care, but only if the bridge is built with an understanding of who is trying to cross it and what obstacles stand in their way. Without addressing these human and social factors, the promise of digital health remains out of reach for those who need it most.
Drowning in papers in your field?
Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.