Tourism comfort and sustainable urban development in 38 Chinese tourist cities: coupling coordination, spatial spillovers, and key drivers
This study analyzes the spatiotemporal coupling and driving mechanisms between tourism comfort and sustainable urban development in 38 Chinese cities from 2000 to 2023, revealing that while both systems have improved with significant positive spatial spillovers, sustainable progress relies heavily on transport connectivity and economic diversification rather than excessive tourism dependence.
Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer
In the modern city, the line between a visitor and a resident is increasingly blurred. Both groups walk the same streets, wait for the same buses, breathe the same air, and rely on the same hospitals and parks. This shared reality creates a unique challenge for places built to welcome tourists: how can a city remain a comfortable, safe, and vibrant destination for visitors without sacrificing the quality of life for the people who call it home? This question sits at the intersection of urban planning and tourism studies. It asks whether the growth of a city's economy and its ability to provide good services can happen at the same time as the growth of its tourism industry, or if these two goals inevitably pull in opposite directions. For decades, cities have often focused on simply attracting more visitors, assuming that more people means a better future. However, a growing body of thought suggests that true success depends on a deeper balance, where the comfort of the tourist and the well-being of the local resident are supported by the same infrastructure and governance.
A team of researchers set out to measure this delicate balance across thirty-eight of China's most popular tourist cities, tracking their progress over twenty-three years, from 2000 to 2023. They did not just look at how many tourists arrived or how much money they spent. Instead, they built a comprehensive picture of "tourism comfort," which they defined not as a feeling, but as the actual, observable conditions a city offers. This included the climate, the availability of scenic spots and museums, the number of hotels and travel agencies, the safety of the streets, and the friendliness of the local atmosphere. They paired this with a measure of "sustainable urban development," which looked at the city's broader health: its economic efficiency, its ability to innovate, the quality of its green spaces, how open it was to the outside world, and how well it shared public services like healthcare and education with its residents. By comparing these two systems, the researchers sought to see if they were moving forward together in harmony or if one was dragging the other down.
The results revealed a story of steady, long-term improvement, but one that is far from perfect. Over the two decades studied, both tourism comfort and sustainable urban development improved significantly across the board. The average city moved from a state of "mild dysfunction," where the two systems were barely working together, to a state of "barely coordinated," where they began to support each other more effectively. However, a clear divide remained. Cities in the east and along the coast consistently outperformed those in the west and inland areas. While the gap between the regions narrowed slightly, the eastern cities, such as Beijing and Shanghai, maintained a distinct lead, while western cities like Xining and Urumqi continued to lag behind. The researchers found that the relationship between these two systems was not just local; it was deeply connected across space. Cities with high levels of coordination tended to be near other cities with high levels, creating clusters of success, while struggling cities often clustered together as well.
When the researchers dug deeper to understand what actually drove this coordination, they found that the most powerful force was not tourism itself, but the ability to move between places. Transport accessibility, measured by the density of the highway network, emerged as the strongest positive driver. Crucially, the benefit of a good transport network did not stop at a city's border; it spilled over to neighboring cities, helping them improve their own coordination as well. In fact, the positive effect a city's transport system had on its neighbors was even stronger than the effect it had on itself. This suggests that building better connections between cities is a more effective way to boost the overall system than focusing on a single city in isolation. Other factors like upgrading local industries and improving healthcare services also provided strong, positive support for both tourists and residents.
Perhaps the most surprising finding was what happened when a city became too dependent on tourism. The study identified a paradox: while a moderate number of visitors helped cities coordinate their development, an excessive economic reliance on tourism actually hurt it. When a city's economy leaned too heavily on visitors, it began to drag down both its own coordination and that of its neighbors. This suggests that when a place becomes too focused on selling a tourist experience, it may neglect the broader needs of its residents, leading to imbalances in resources and increased pressure on public services. The data showed that cities with diverse economies and strong public services were better able to handle shocks and maintain a high quality of life for everyone, whereas those that relied too heavily on visitor numbers found themselves vulnerable.
The study concludes that the future of popular tourist cities lies not in chasing higher visitor numbers, but in building a shared foundation. Success depends on connectivity, economic diversity, and the provision of high-quality public services that benefit both the person on vacation and the person going to work. The researchers suggest that the most successful cities will be those that view tourism not as a separate industry, but as an integral part of a larger urban ecosystem. By investing in transport networks that link cities together and ensuring that economic growth is broad-based rather than tourism-heavy, cities can create environments where the comfort of the visitor and the well-being of the resident are not competing goals, but mutually reinforcing realities. This approach offers a path forward for cities that wish to remain vibrant destinations without losing the soul of the communities that sustain them.
Drowning in papers in your field?
Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.