Evaluating Multi-Dimensional Community Interventions on Forest Dependency in the First Addition to Manas National Park, Assam, India
This study demonstrates that a multi-dimensional intervention strategy combining micro-livelihood support, clean energy access, solar fencing, and polycentric governance successfully reduced forest resource extraction and dependency among communities surrounding the First Addition to Manas National Park in Assam, India, between 2019 and 2021.
Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer
Protected areas are the world's primary tools for saving biodiversity, yet they face a persistent paradox: the very people living on their edges often rely on the forest for their daily survival. In many parts of the developing world, households depend on wood for cooking and gathering plants for income, creating a direct conflict between human needs and conservation goals. The challenge for scientists and conservationists is to understand how to break this cycle without simply pushing people away or ignoring their poverty. The key lies in viewing the forest and the community not as separate enemies, but as parts of a single, interconnected system where changes in one part ripple through the other. If a community can find a way to meet its needs without stripping the forest, the forest has a chance to heal, and the people can thrive. This delicate balance is the focus of a recent evaluation in the rugged, forested landscapes of northeastern India.
In the First Addition to Manas National Park, a 350-square-kilometer extension of a UNESCO World Heritage Site in Assam, a team from the Wildlife Trust of India set out to test a multi-pronged approach to this problem. For years, the organization had been working in the villages bordering the park, implementing a mix of strategies designed to reduce the community's reliance on the forest. These strategies included providing clean cooking gas to replace firewood, offering financial support for small businesses like raising goats or poultry, and building a community-managed solar fence to keep wildlife out of farms. The researchers wanted to know if these combined efforts actually worked. To find out, they spent three years, from 2019 to 2021, watching the forest paths and talking to the families living nearby. They counted every person entering the forest, noted what they were carrying, and tracked how many households were still completely dependent on the woods for their livelihood.
The results painted a clear picture of significant change. The number of people walking into the forest every day dropped by nearly 60 percent. More strikingly, the number of households that were critically dependent on the forest for their survival fell by 80 percent, shrinking from 274 families down to just 54. The researchers observed that the type of forest use changed as well. While people still collected some firewood for cooking, the large-scale removal of commercial timber and valuable non-timber forest products nearly vanished. Commercial timber extraction fell by 88 percent, and the gathering of other forest products dropped by 83 percent. This suggests that the interventions successfully targeted the most damaging forms of extraction, allowing the forest to recover from the heavy pressure of commercial logging and bulk harvesting.
A crucial part of this success was a physical barrier that acted as a selective filter. The team installed an 11-kilometer solar fence along the park boundary. While fences are often used to keep animals out, this one also changed how people moved. The fence made it impossible to pull heavy, hand-drawn carts, which were the primary way people transported large loads of timber and bulk forest products. Consequently, the use of these carts plummeted by two-thirds. However, the fence did not stop people entirely; individuals carrying smaller loads on their heads or riding bicycles could still pass through narrow gates. This design meant that the barrier naturally discouraged large-scale, commercial theft while still allowing for limited, subsistence-level access. The data showed that when the fence was first being built, some people temporarily shifted to a different path, but once the fence was complete and the community had new livelihood options, the overall traffic into the forest settled at a much lower level.
The study also highlighted the power of local governance. The project helped establish nine local committees, known as Eco-Development Committees, which brought together village leaders, forest officials, and conservation staff. These groups managed the fence and helped distribute support, creating a sense of shared ownership and responsibility. This shift in how decisions were made appears to have been just as important as the physical infrastructure. By giving the community a stake in the park's management and providing alternative ways to earn a living, the project helped decouple the villagers' daily lives from the need to extract resources from the forest. The researchers noted that while the COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns in 2020 may have temporarily reduced movement, the decline in forest use continued even after restrictions were lifted, suggesting the changes were driven by the interventions rather than just a temporary pause in activity.
Ultimately, the findings suggest that protecting a forest in a human-dominated landscape requires more than just policing the boundary. It demands a holistic approach that addresses the economic and social reasons people enter the woods in the first place. By combining physical barriers that stop large-scale exploitation with economic support that reduces the need for it, and by empowering local communities to manage their own resources, it is possible to create a lasting reduction in forest dependency. The work in Manas offers a hopeful model for other transboundary landscapes, showing that when conservation and community development are woven together, the forest can recover, and the people living on its edge can find a sustainable future.
Drowning in papers in your field?
Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.