Hidden antibiotic exposures: A scoping review of residues detected in humans without recent, intentional use
This scoping review of 32 studies reveals that antibiotic residues are frequently detected in up to half of individuals from low- and middle-income countries who report no recent intentional use, highlighting a significant, under-characterized source of inadvertent exposure with potential implications for the human microbiome and antimicrobial resistance.
Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer
Every year, humanity consumes vast quantities of antibiotics, the powerful medicines designed to kill bacteria and cure infections. Most of these drugs pass through our bodies and are excreted, eventually making their way into the soil, rivers, and oceans. Conventional water treatment plants often cannot filter them out completely, leaving a trail of microscopic drug residues in the environment. Scientists have long worried that this constant, low-level presence of antibiotics in our water and food could act as a slow, invisible pressure on the bacteria living inside us. Just as a little bit of poison might train a pest to survive a stronger dose later, these tiny, accidental exposures could encourage bacteria to evolve defenses, making future infections harder to treat. This process, known as selecting for resistance, is a major global health threat, but it has been difficult to prove how often ordinary people are actually exposed to these residues without knowing it.
A team of researchers set out to map the extent of this hidden exposure. They conducted a comprehensive review of existing scientific studies to find evidence of antibiotic residues in the bodies of people who had not recently taken any medicine. Their goal was simple: to see if traces of these drugs could be found in blood, urine, stool, or breast milk of individuals who claimed they had not used antibiotics recently. By gathering data from dozens of studies across the globe, they aimed to determine whether this inadvertent exposure is a rare occurrence or a common reality for people living in certain parts of the world.
The researchers analyzed thirty-two studies involving nearly eleven and a half thousand participants. These studies were conducted primarily in low- and middle-income countries, with a heavy concentration in China, as well as nations in Africa and parts of Asia. Notably, no studies from Europe or North America met their criteria, leaving a gap in knowledge about exposure in those regions. The scientists looked for any sign of antibiotic activity in human samples, using sophisticated laboratory techniques to detect specific drug molecules or their breakdown products. They focused on people who had not taken antibiotics recently, though the definition of "recent" varied from study to study, ranging from a few days to several months of abstinence.
The findings revealed a startlingly common presence of these drugs. Across the studies, roughly half of the people tested had at least one antibiotic residue or its metabolite in their system. The most frequently detected drugs belonged to a class known as fluoroquinolones, which includes common antibiotics like ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin, and ofloxacin. These specific drugs were found in about one-fifth of all the participants tested. In some cases, the levels of ciprofloxacin found in urine were as high as what one would expect to see in a person actively taking a therapeutic dose of the medicine for an infection. This suggests that for some individuals, the accidental intake of antibiotics through food or water is substantial enough to reach levels that could biologically impact the body.
The types of samples collected varied, but urine was the most common, followed by stool, breast milk, and blood. The researchers also noted that these residues appeared in vulnerable groups, including pregnant women and children, for whom certain antibiotics are typically avoided. In some instances, the drugs found were those used in veterinary medicine, indicating that the source of exposure likely included animal products or environmental contamination from farming. The study authors pointed out that the persistence of these drugs in the environment plays a key role; some antibiotics break down quickly, while others, like certain tetracyclines and sulfonamides, can linger in soil and water for weeks or even months, traveling long distances before reaching humans.
Despite the clear evidence of exposure, the review highlighted significant limitations in what we currently know. Many of the studies relied on participants simply saying they had not taken antibiotics, which can be unreliable if people forget, do not realize a medication is an antibiotic, or obtain drugs without a prescription. Furthermore, the studies used different methods to measure the drugs, making it hard to compare results directly or create a single global picture. The researchers also noted that very few of the included studies actually investigated what these residues were doing to the human gut or whether they were directly causing antibiotic resistance in the people tested.
The review concludes that inadvertent exposure to antibiotic residues is a widespread phenomenon in many parts of the world, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. While the data does not yet prove that this exposure is the primary driver of global antibiotic resistance, the fact that half of the tested population carried these residues, and that some levels matched therapeutic doses, is a strong signal that something is happening. The authors suggest that understanding the sources of this exposure—whether it is contaminated water, food, or soil—and its consequences for human health and bacterial evolution is now an urgent priority. The invisible trail of antibiotics left behind by human and animal use appears to be looping back to us, and the full impact of this cycle remains to be fully understood.
Drowning in papers in your field?
Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.