State spatial restructuring and edge-city formation in China: hierarchical reorganisation, interjurisdictional coordination and capital accumulation
Drawing on rescaling theory and a case study of Kunshan, this paper argues that China's edge cities are state-led political projects formed through hierarchical reorganisation and interjurisdictional coordination, which empower county-level governments to strategically reshape metropolitan governance and capital accumulation beyond Western market-driven suburbanisation models.
Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer
In the United States, the story of how cities grow outward is often told as a tale of market forces. As people and businesses seek cheaper land and more space, they naturally drift away from crowded city centers, creating new hubs of activity in the suburbs. These new hubs, often called edge cities, are typically seen as the result of private developers and individual choices, with the government playing a relatively small role. However, in China, the story of urban growth looks very different. Here, the expansion of cities is not just a reaction to market demands but is actively shaped by the government through a system of administrative levels and strategic planning. To understand this, one must look at how power is distributed across different levels of government, from the national capital down to local counties, and how these levels work together to build new economic spaces. The question researchers are asking is how a place that starts as a quiet, rural county can transform into a major economic engine, and what role the government plays in making that happen.
A team of researchers set out to answer this question by studying Kunshan, a city located just west of Shanghai. Kunshan offers a perfect window into this process because it has undergone a dramatic transformation over the last forty years. In the early 1980s, it was a modest agricultural county with little industry. Today, it is a bustling economic powerhouse with a gross domestic product that exceeds that of several entire Chinese provinces. The researchers wanted to understand the specific mechanisms that allowed this change to occur. They did not simply look at economic statistics; instead, they examined the political and administrative moves made by local, provincial, and national governments. Through a deep dive into government documents, urban plans, and interviews with officials, planners, and business leaders, they traced the journey of Kunshan from a rural periphery to a vital part of the Shanghai metropolitan region.
The study reveals that Kunshan's rise was not a spontaneous event driven solely by private investment. Instead, it was the result of a carefully orchestrated process involving two main strategies. The first strategy involves the government rearranging its own internal hierarchy to give local leaders more power. In China, the government operates through a strict ladder of authority. Usually, a small county has very limited ability to make big decisions or approve large projects. However, to help Kunshan grow, higher levels of government selectively granted it special permissions. They allowed the local government to build a special economic zone without waiting for full approval, gave them the authority to approve foreign investments directly, and eventually upgraded the status of the local development zone so it could bypass some of the usual bureaucratic hurdles. This is like giving a local team a special pass to make decisions that would normally require a visit from the head office, allowing them to act quickly and attract business before their neighbors could.
The second strategy focuses on connecting Kunshan physically and politically to the nearby giant, Shanghai. Even though Kunshan is a separate city in a different province, the government worked to weave it into the fabric of the Shanghai region. A prime example of this is the construction of a subway line. In China, subway systems are usually built entirely within one city's borders. However, to link Kunshan to Shanghai, the two governments worked together to extend Shanghai's Metro Line 11 across the provincial border. This was a significant engineering and political feat that allowed people to live in Kunshan and work in Shanghai, effectively merging the two economies. Beyond the tracks, the governments also created new committees and planning groups that included officials from both sides to coordinate everything from industrial development to public safety. This ensured that the two places grew together in a coordinated way, rather than competing against each other.
The researchers found that these two strategies—rearranging local power and building connections with the core city—worked together like a machine to drive growth. The local government used its new powers to build industrial parks and attract factories, while the connections to Shanghai brought in a steady stream of workers and investment. Over time, Kunshan evolved from a place that simply received leftover factories from Shanghai into a sophisticated partner that collaborates on high-tech industries like semiconductors and electric vehicles. The study shows that the government did not just step back and let the market decide; it actively built the stage, handed out the scripts, and directed the actors to create a new kind of city.
This process challenges the common idea that edge cities are purely the result of market forces. In the case of Kunshan, the government was the primary architect. The researchers argue that this model represents a unique way of organizing space and capital that is distinct from the Western experience. It shows how a government can use its administrative power to create new economic opportunities, turning a rural county into a global hub. The study suggests that this approach allows for rapid development and integration, but it also highlights that the relationship between the core city and the edge city remains unequal, with the core city retaining significant influence over the direction of growth. Ultimately, the story of Kunshan is a story of how a government can strategically reshape the landscape to achieve its economic goals, proving that in China, the map of the future is drawn as much by policy as by the market.
Drowning in papers in your field?
Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.