Professionalism as a developmental competency: insights from workplace-based assessment in Brazilian pediatric residency
This study demonstrates the feasibility of using the Brazilian version of the Professionalism Mini-Evaluation Exercise (P-MEX) to assess pediatric residents, revealing that professionalism is a developmental competency that varies across domains and years of training rather than being a stable attribute.
Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer
In the world of medicine, being a skilled doctor involves more than just memorizing anatomy or knowing which pill treats which disease. It requires a deep-seated set of values and behaviors known as professionalism. This concept includes how a doctor listens to a patient, respects a family's wishes, admits when they do not know the answer, and manages their time under pressure. Unlike a surgical technique that can be practiced on a model until it is perfect, professionalism is a living quality that changes depending on the situation and grows as a doctor gains experience. Because it is so personal and context-dependent, it is notoriously difficult to measure. You cannot test it with a multiple-choice exam. Instead, educators must watch doctors in the real world, in the middle of actual patient care, to see if these values are truly taking root. This is especially critical in pediatrics, where doctors care for children who cannot speak for themselves and must navigate complex relationships with worried parents and large medical teams.
A team of researchers in Brazil set out to understand how this professional growth happens during pediatric residency training. They focused on a specific group of twenty-seven female doctors in training at a teaching hospital in Goiás. These residents were in their first, second, or third year of training, caring for newborns in a neonatal unit. The researchers wanted to see if professionalism improved as the residents gained more experience, or if it stayed the same. To do this, they used a tool called the Professionalism Mini-Evaluation Exercise, or P-MEX. This is a structured checklist that trained supervisors use to observe residents during their daily work. After watching a resident interact with a patient or a family, the supervisor fills out the form and immediately gives the resident feedback. The tool looks at four main areas: how the doctor connects with the patient, how they reflect on their own actions, how they manage their time, and how they work with other medical staff.
The study found that, on average, the residents were behaving professionally. They scored well across the board, showing they could listen, show respect, and maintain appropriate boundaries. However, the researchers discovered something surprising when they looked closer at the different years of training. The third-year residents, who were the most experienced and had the most responsibility, actually scored lower than the first and second-year residents in one specific area: time management. While the newer residents managed their schedules effectively, the senior residents struggled more with punctuality and completing tasks on time. This difference was not seen in how they treated patients or how they worked with colleagues; those skills remained steady throughout the training. The study also found that the type of medical school a resident attended, whether public or private, did not affect their scores, nor did their age.
This result might seem counterintuitive at first, as one might expect a doctor to get better at everything as they gain more experience. The researchers suggest that this drop in time management scores is not a sign of failure, but rather a sign of a changing role. As residents move into their final year, they take on heavier burdens. They are no longer just learning; they are leading teams, supervising junior doctors, making complex decisions for critically ill babies, and managing the emotional weight of difficult cases. The chaos of a busy neonatal unit, with its unpredictable emergencies and the need to coordinate many people, makes strict time management much harder to achieve. The senior residents are not being less professional; they are simply navigating a much more complex and demanding environment. Their struggle with the clock reflects the reality of their increased responsibility rather than a lack of skill.
The study confirms that professionalism is not a fixed trait that a doctor either has or does not have. Instead, it is a developmental competency that shifts and evolves as the doctor's role changes. The fact that the third-year residents scored lower in time management suggests that the pressures of seniority can challenge even the most dedicated trainees. The researchers emphasize that tools like the P-MEX are valuable not just for grading, but for learning. By watching residents in real situations and giving them immediate feedback, educators can help them reflect on these challenges. This process helps doctors understand that professionalism is a continuous journey of adaptation. The study concludes that while these residents are meeting the standards expected of them, their professional identity is still forming, shaped by the increasing weight of the responsibilities they carry. Future studies will need to follow doctors over a longer period to see how these patterns hold up as they move from training into independent practice.
Drowning in papers in your field?
Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.