Protection as Criminalization: PCEPA, Policy Contradictions, and the Unequal Governance of Sex Work in Canada
This critical policy analysis argues that Canada's Protection of Communities and Exploited Persons Act (PCEPA) fundamentally contradicts its protective intent by criminalizing the sex market and surrounding relationships, thereby redistributing rather than eliminating occupational risks while disproportionately harming marginalized groups through the conflation of consensual sex work with trafficking.
Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer
In Canada, the laws governing the sale of sexual services have long been a source of deep division. For decades, the central question was how to protect people who sell sex without trapping them in danger. The legal system had to decide whether to treat this activity as a crime, a form of labor, or a sign of exploitation. When the Supreme Court of Canada ruled in 2013 that previous laws were unsafe because they forced workers into isolated and dangerous situations, the government had to create a new approach. The result was a law called the Protection of Communities and Exploited Persons Act, passed in 2014. This law was built on a specific idea: that buying sex is the root of the problem, while selling it is a sign of vulnerability. The government decided to punish the buyers and the people who profit from the transaction, while offering limited protection to the sellers themselves. The hope was that by stopping the demand, the market would shrink, and the people selling sex would be safer. But a decade later, researchers are asking whether this strategy actually works as intended, or if it has created a new set of problems that are just as dangerous.
Two researchers, Emmanuel Chilanga and Phiona Neromi, set out to examine the real-world effects of this law from its start in 2014 through 2026. They did not conduct new surveys or interview people directly. Instead, they performed a deep, critical reading of ten key documents that shaped the law and its aftermath. These included the original court ruling, the text of the new law, parliamentary reports, government responses, and official police statistics. They also looked at academic studies and community reports to see how the law played out in hospitals, on the streets, and in courtrooms. Their goal was to understand not just what the law said, but what it actually did to the people it was meant to protect. They wanted to see if the promise of safety matched the reality of daily life for sex workers across the country.
The researchers found that the law operates on a contradiction. It claims to offer protection, but it does so by criminalizing the very conditions that make work safe. Under the new rules, a person selling sex is not technically a criminal, but the people they might hire for safety—like a driver, a security guard, or a landlord—can be arrested for helping them. The law treats the entire environment around the transaction as suspicious. This creates a situation where a worker might be legally allowed to sell sex, but cannot safely hire someone to watch their back or find a safe place to work. The researchers describe this as a system that redistributes risk. Instead of removing danger, the law pushes it onto the people with the fewest resources. A wealthy worker with a private office and a lawyer might navigate these rules with some safety, but a worker who is homeless, new to the country, or living in poverty faces much higher risks of violence, arrest, or deportation.
The study highlights that the law fails to distinguish clearly between consensual adult work and forced trafficking. By treating all sex work as a form of exploitation, the government often groups together people who are being forced into the trade with those who are making a choice to work. This confusion makes it harder to help the people who are actually being coerced, because the laws designed to stop them also punish those who are trying to stay safe. For example, a migrant worker might be afraid to call the police after an assault because they fear that reporting a crime will lead to their own deportation. The researchers found that the law has made it harder for these workers to access health care, housing, and justice. The data shows that while fewer women are being charged with crimes, the number of violent incidents and homicides involving sex workers has not disappeared, and many remain unsolved.
One of the most significant findings is that the law does not treat all workers the same. The risks are not spread evenly; they fall hardest on Indigenous women, racialized people, migrants, and those who are poor or unhoused. The researchers noted that for Indigenous workers, the law adds to a long history of colonial control and removal of children, making them even more vulnerable to police surveillance. For migrant workers, the threat of deportation silences them, making them easy targets for exploitation. The pandemic further exposed these inequalities, as workers without stable housing or legal status struggled to survive when the economy shut down. The law did not create these inequalities, but it made them worse by removing the tools workers used to protect themselves, such as working together in groups or advertising their services online to screen clients.
The researchers also looked at a recent Supreme Court decision that tried to clarify the rules. The court ruled that hiring a driver or a security guard is not a crime if the relationship is not exploitative. While this was a positive step, the researchers argued that knowing a law is on your side is not the same as being safe in practice. If a worker is stopped by police, they may not have the money or the legal knowledge to prove their relationship is legitimate. The fear of being arrested or having their documents seized often keeps workers from seeking help, even when the law says they are allowed to work. The study concludes that the government's approach of using criminal punishment to create safety is fundamentally flawed. It creates a system where the state claims to protect a group of people while simultaneously making their lives more dangerous.
The authors suggest that for Canada to truly protect its citizens, it must separate the issue of voluntary adult work from the issue of forced trafficking. They argue that laws should stop punishing the people who sell sex and instead focus entirely on the violence and coercion that happen within the industry. This means repealing parts of the law that criminalize communication and advertising, which currently force workers into the shadows. It also means changing immigration rules so that migrant workers can report crimes without fear of being kicked out of the country. Most importantly, the researchers insist that the people who live with these laws every day must have a seat at the table when new policies are made. They believe that true safety comes from giving workers the power to make their own decisions, access housing and health care, and organize for their own protection, rather than relying on a criminal system that often fails to see them as human beings deserving of rights.
Drowning in papers in your field?
Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.