Peer-Led Leadership, Mentoring and Promotion: Conversations Among Female Academics from South Africa, Ghana and the United Kingdom
This paper presents findings from a workshop involving female academics from South Africa, Ghana, and the United Kingdom, which utilized structured activities and discussions to highlight the need for peer support and transparent promotion processes while demonstrating that the event successfully enhanced participants' self-awareness, mentoring commitment, and confidence in pursuing career advancement.
Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of a preprint that has not been peer-reviewed. It is not medical advice. Do not make health decisions based on this content. Read full disclaimer
Imagine a giant, invisible ladder that leads to the top of the academic mountain. For decades, it's been noticed that women often get stuck on the lower rungs, even when they have the skills to climb higher. Why? Maybe the ladder is wobbly, the rungs are hidden, or maybe the climbers just need a better map and a few friends to cheer them on.
This paper is the story of a one-day "climbing camp" held at Stellenbosch University in South Africa. It brought together 36 women from South Africa, Ghana, and the United Kingdom—researchers, teachers, lab managers, and students—to figure out how to get unstuck. The camp wasn't run by a bossy expert from the top; instead, it was a peer-led event, meaning the guides were fellow climbers who had been there, done that, and were ready to share their secrets.
Here is what happened when they gathered, broken down into three main adventures:
1. The Leadership Style Swap
First, the group looked at how they lead their own teams. Before the camp, everyone took a quick quiz to see what kind of "leader hat" they usually wear. The results were like a fashion show of management styles:
- The "Protective Parent" (Paternalistic): 13 people said this was their main style. Think of a leader who makes sure everyone is safe and fed, but sometimes does everything for them.
- The "Circle of Friends" (Democratic): 10 people picked this. They like to ask everyone what they think before making a decision.
- The "Visionary Dreamer" (Transformational): Only 2 people said this was their main style. These are the ones who try to inspire everyone to see a big, exciting future.
- The "Bossy One" (Autocratic) and the "Do-It-Yourself" (Laissez-faire): Almost no one chose these.
The Big Realization: The paper suggests that while being a "Protective Parent" feels good, it can accidentally make the team dependent, like a parent who ties their child's shoes every day so the child never learns to do it themselves. The participants realized they needed to swap some of that protection for more "Democratic" sharing of power. One participant said, "I'm trying to be less of a protective parent and let my team take the lead so they can grow their own muscles."
2. The Mentorship Magic
Next, they talked about mentoring. Usually, mentoring is like a strict teacher-student relationship where the older, wiser person tells the younger one what to do. But this paper argues that this old-school way can sometimes keep the system stuck, like a wheel spinning in mud.
Instead, they championed reciprocal mentoring. Imagine two people swapping stories across a fence. One might know how to navigate the UK university system, while the other knows how to handle family expectations in Ghana. They teach each other.
- The Fact: The paper describes a real project between the University of Sussex (UK) and the University of Ghana where 46 women paired up. They met six times over six months.
- The Problem: Many participants said they rarely got mentoring until they were already very senior. They felt like they were climbing the ladder alone.
- The Shift: After the camp, 4 out of 5 participants said they planned to change how they mentor. They wanted to be more intentional, checking in regularly and caring about the whole person, not just their work output. One person even said they would ask their own boss to be a clearer mentor, realizing they can't just wait for help to appear.
3. The "Ready vs. Recognized" Gap
Finally, they tackled the biggest mystery: Why do women wait so long to apply for promotion, even when they are qualified?
- The Metaphor: Imagine you are a chef who has cooked a perfect meal for years. But you don't apply for the "Head Chef" job because you think you need to cook one more perfect meal first, or because you're afraid the judges won't notice you.
- The Reality: The paper found that women often wait longer than men to apply, even when they are equally successful. They face "invisible work"—like organizing department parties or mentoring students—that doesn't show up on a resume but takes up all their time.
- The Barriers: Participants listed things like confusing rules, a lack of clear paths, and feeling like they aren't "famous enough." One participant noted that applying for promotion often gets pushed to the bottom of the to-do list because of paperwork and other demands.
- The Suggestion: The paper suggests that the solution isn't just for women to "be more confident." It's for the institutions to make the rules clear, reduce the paperwork, and have mentors who actively "sponsor" women (pushing their names forward) rather than just giving advice.
What Did They Actually Prove?
It is important to be clear about what this paper says and what it doesn't.
- It does NOT say that this one-day workshop fixed the entire university system or solved gender inequality forever. The paper is careful to say these are small, focused events.
- It DOES say that for the people who attended, the workshop worked. The participants reported feeling more aware of their leadership styles, more committed to mentoring others, and more confident about taking steps toward promotion.
- It suggests that this "peer-led" model is a portable, low-cost way to help. It's like a toolkit that any university can use to create a safe space for women to share stories and plan their next moves.
In short, the paper argues that while the mountain is still steep and the path is still foggy, giving women a place to talk, swap maps, and realize they aren't climbing alone makes a real difference in how they see their own journey. As one participant put it, it's about "sending the elevator back down" to help the next person up.
Drowning in papers in your field?
Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.