The Art of Recovery: Performative Retreat in 21st Century Fiction
This article applies Jenny Odell's critique of productivity-driven rest to Sue Townsend's *The Woman Who Went to Bed for a Year* and Ottessa Moshfegh's *My Year of Rest and Relaxation*, arguing that despite their protagonists' attempts to escape 21st-century demands through performative retreat, systemic neoliberal forces ultimately prevent them from achieving true invisibility or autonomy.
Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer
In recent years, a quiet but growing conversation has taken place across medicine, art, and social activism regarding the true value of rest. For much of the modern era, the prevailing idea has been that stopping work is merely a pause, a brief recharge needed to return to productivity with renewed energy. This view treats leisure as a horizontal line, a gap between periods of labor. However, a different perspective suggests that true rest is not a break from work but a complete departure from the logic of work itself. This deeper form of rest is seen not as a tool for efficiency, but as a radical act of reclaiming one's life from a system that demands constant output. As society grapples with the erosion of boundaries between home and work, and the pressure to constantly perform even in private moments, scholars are asking whether it is possible to truly withdraw from these demands. The question has moved beyond simple self-care advice to a broader inquiry into how individuals, particularly women, navigate a world that offers no true escape from the market's reach.
A new article by Tory Young of Anglia Ruskin University explores this tension by examining two novels that depict women attempting to solve the misery of modern life by doing absolutely nothing. The author analyzes Sue Townsend's 2012 novel, The Woman Who Went to Bed for a Year, and Ottessa Moshfegh's 2018 novel, My Year of Rest and Relaxation. Both stories feature female protagonists who decide to stay in bed for an entire year, a drastic measure intended to opt out of the relentless pace of the twenty-first century. The paper investigates whether this physical withdrawal actually allows them to escape the pressures of society, or if the demands of the world simply follow them into the bedroom.
The study begins by looking at the work of Jenny Odell, a writer who argues that the desire for more time is actually a desire for autonomy and meaning, not just more hours in the day. Odell suggests that the current system turns even leisure into a commodity, where people feel guilty for not being productive enough. The author of the article applies these ideas to the two novels, noting that while the characters try to hide, they cannot truly become invisible. In Townsend's story, Eva Beaver, a fifty-year-old mother and wife, retreats to her bed after a lifetime of being taken for granted by her family. She strips her room of furniture and asks for nothing, hoping to find a space of peace. However, her attempt at isolation backfires. Instead of being left alone, she is discovered by neighbors and strangers who view her bed-rest as a spiritual act. They begin to treat her like a saint or a mystic, bringing her problems and seeking her advice. Her quiet withdrawal transforms her into a public figure, forcing her to engage with the very world she tried to leave. The novel suggests that in a society obsessed with connection and performance, even the act of doing nothing becomes a form of labor.
In contrast, Moshfegh's novel presents a narrator who is wealthy, selfish, and emotionally deadened. She decides to sleep for a year using powerful prescription drugs, aiming not for peace, but for total oblivion. She wants to erase her consciousness completely. Like Eva, she tries to remove herself from the world, giving away her possessions and locking herself in a bare room. Yet, her retreat is also impossible to maintain in isolation. Her hibernation depends entirely on a transactional relationship with a doctor who provides the drugs and a man who delivers pizza in exchange for the right to film her. Her attempt to stop time is funded by the very capitalist structures she despises. When she finally wakes, she finds herself in a world marked by tragedy, specifically the events of September 11, 2001. Her transformation is cut short by the harsh reality of the world outside, suggesting that a drug-induced sleep cannot shield a person from the collective trauma of society.
The central finding of the article is that both novels demonstrate the impossibility of a complete retreat from the "relational matrix" of modern life. The characters cannot simply opt out of the system; their attempts to do so only make them more visible and entangled in it. Eva becomes a guru against her will, and the narrator in Moshfegh's book becomes a muse for an artist and a subject for a doctor. The paper argues that these stories reveal a fundamental truth about the twenty-first century: the boundary between rest and work has collapsed. Even when a person lies still, the demands of the economy, social media, and interpersonal relationships continue to press in. The author suggests that while the desire to withdraw is a natural reaction to an overwhelming world, the novels show that true invisibility is not an option. The women in these stories are not able to remove themselves from the values of productivity and market exchange; instead, their inactivity is absorbed and repurposed by the society they are trying to escape.
Ultimately, the article concludes that the phrase "doing nothing" is a contradiction in the current era. One cannot be active and inactive at the same time, and the attempt to do so only highlights the impossible demands placed on individuals today. The novels do not offer a solution to the systemic problems of inequality and overwork, but they do provide a clear picture of the struggle. They show that while the desire for a radical break is powerful, the structures of society are too pervasive to be escaped by a single person lying in bed. The stories serve as a reminder that the problem is not just individual burnout, but a system that makes true rest nearly impossible to achieve.
Drowning in papers in your field?
Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.