← Latest papers
🧬 biology

TGFβ1 and BMP9 signal laterally through direct type I receptor cross-activation on a type II receptor scaffold

This study reveals that lateral TGFβ and BMP signaling is a defined receptor-level mechanism where type II receptors serve as scaffolds to bring opposing type I receptors into close proximity, enabling their direct cross-activation rather than representing a mere leak between pathways.

Original authors: Michael Trumpp, Kjell Bruckmann, Sophia Mähr, Jerome Jatzlau, Petra Knaus

Published 2026-10-15
📖 5 min read🧠 Deep dive

Original authors: Michael Trumpp, Kjell Bruckmann, Sophia Mähr, Jerome Jatzlau, Petra Knaus

Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). ⚕️ This is an AI-generated explanation of a preprint that has not been peer-reviewed. It is not medical advice. Do not make health decisions based on this content. Read full disclaimer

Inside the cells of every living organism, a sophisticated communication network operates to manage growth, repair tissues, and maintain balance. This network relies on chemical messengers that travel to the cell surface and attach to specific receptors, acting like keys turning in locks. Two major families of these messengers, known as transforming growth factor beta and bone morphogenetic proteins, usually take separate paths once they enter the cell. One family typically instructs the cell to perform one set of tasks, while the other directs a different, often opposing, set of actions. For decades, scientists believed these two pathways remained strictly separate, like two distinct telephone lines that never crossed. However, researchers have long suspected that these lines sometimes get crossed, allowing a message intended for one system to accidentally trigger the other. This phenomenon, called lateral signaling, has been observed in various tissues and diseases, including cancer and blood vessel formation, but the exact mechanism behind how it happens has remained a mystery.

A team of researchers at Freie Universität Berlin has now uncovered the physical mechanism that allows these two signaling pathways to cross-talk. They discovered that the receptors on the cell surface do not just act as passive receivers; they can physically reach out and activate one another directly. In their study, the scientists demonstrated that when two different types of receptors are forced close together, one can turn on the other, creating a hybrid signal that the cell would not normally produce. This process is not a random error or a leak in the system, but a defined, structural event orchestrated by a third component: a scaffold receptor that holds the two active partners in the perfect position to interact.

To understand how this works, imagine the cell surface as a busy docking station where various proteins float and interact. Normally, a messenger protein binds to a specific receptor, which then activates a second receptor nearby. This second receptor then sends a signal into the cell's nucleus to change how genes are read. The researchers found that if a receptor from the first family is already active, it can jump across and activate a receptor from the second family, provided they are held close enough together. To prove this, the scientists used a clever chemical trick to tether specific receptors together on the surface of human cells. They created versions of the receptors that were permanently switched on and then used a molecular glue to pull them into immediate proximity. When they brought a permanently active receptor from the first family close to a normal receptor from the second family, the second receptor immediately turned on and sent its own unique signal into the cell. This happened in both directions: an active receptor from the first family could trigger the second, and an active receptor from the second family could trigger the first.

The study also revealed that this cross-activation is not limited to just one specific pair of receptors but appears to be a general rule for this entire family of signaling proteins. The researchers tested several different combinations and found that whenever they forced two different receptors together, they could trigger this lateral response. Crucially, they discovered that the receptor responsible for initially catching the messenger protein plays a dual role. It not only activates its partner but also provides a structural platform that allows the two active partners to interact. This platform is a specific part of the receptor called the kinase domain. Surprisingly, this part does not need to be chemically active or perform any enzymatic work to facilitate the cross-talk. Instead, it acts like a rigid scaffold or a bracket, holding the two signaling proteins in the precise alignment needed for them to activate each other. If the researchers removed this structural piece, the cross-activation stopped, even though the receptors could still bind to each other.

Furthermore, the team identified that different types of scaffold receptors are required depending on which messenger is present. When the cell receives a signal from the first family of messengers, a specific scaffold receptor is needed to enable the cross-talk. When the signal comes from the second family, a different scaffold receptor is required. The researchers found that the ability of these scaffold receptors to support this cross-talk depends on their outer structure, which determines which messenger they can catch, and their inner structure, which acts as the physical bracket. This explains why certain cells might show this cross-talk while others do not, depending on which specific receptors they have available on their surface.

The findings suggest that lateral signaling is a deliberate, structural feature of how cells process information, rather than a mistake. By holding two different signaling proteins together, the cell can generate a mixed signal that combines instructions from both pathways. This allows for a more nuanced response than either pathway could produce alone, potentially explaining how cells make complex decisions during development or how they malfunction in diseases like cancer. The research provides a clear, physical explanation for a phenomenon that has puzzled scientists for years, showing that the cell's communication network is more interconnected and mechanically sophisticated than previously imagined.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →