Couple fertility-preference concordance and decision-making regarding contraceptive non-use among women in union in Somalia: A cross-sectional study
This cross-sectional study of 7,481 women in union in Somalia reveals that while fertility-preference discordance does not significantly influence contraceptive non-use decision-making, uncertainty regarding a partner's fertility preferences is associated with a higher likelihood of joint decision-making compared to concordant couples.
Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer
In many parts of the world, the choice to use birth control is often studied as a decision made by a woman alone. Researchers look at her education, her income, and her access to clinics to understand why she might or might not use contraception. However, for most people, having a family is a shared journey. A couple's decision to have children, or to space them out, usually involves two people with their own hopes, fears, and ideas about the future. When these two people want different things, or when they simply do not know what the other wants, the path forward can become complicated. Understanding how partners talk, negotiate, and influence each other is crucial, because the decision to not use birth control is rarely just a personal preference; it is often a result of a relationship.
This question is particularly urgent in Somalia, where the use of modern birth control methods remains extremely low. Recent national surveys show that fewer than two percent of women use modern methods, a figure that suggests the barrier is not just about the availability of pills or devices, but about the deeper social and family dynamics at play. To understand this, a researcher from the University of Hargeisa turned to a massive national survey conducted in 2020. Instead of asking women only about their own choices, the study looked at the relationship between a woman's desire for more children and her husband's desire. The goal was to see if agreement or disagreement between partners, or even uncertainty about what a partner wanted, changed who made the final call to skip birth control.
The researcher analyzed data from nearly 7,500 married women who were not pregnant and not currently using contraception. These women were asked a direct question: who decided that they would not use birth control? Was it mainly her decision, mainly her husband's decision, or did they decide together? The study then grouped these women based on whether their desire for more children matched their husband's. Some couples wanted the same number of children; others wanted different numbers; and for some, the woman simply did not know what her husband wanted. By comparing these groups, the study could see if the pattern of decision-making changed depending on how well the couple's desires aligned.
The results revealed a clear picture of how these decisions are made. Among the women surveyed, the decision to not use birth control was rarely made by the woman alone. Instead, it was most often a joint decision, made by both partners together, or a decision led primarily by the husband. Roughly one-third of the women said they decided together with their spouse, while about one-third said the husband was the main decision-maker. Only about a quarter said the decision was mainly theirs. This finding alone shifts the focus from the individual woman to the couple, showing that reproductive choices in this context are deeply relational.
When the researcher looked at whether couples agreed on their family size, a surprising pattern emerged. One might assume that if a husband and wife wanted different numbers of children, the decision would fall to one person to override the other. However, the data showed that disagreement between partners did not significantly predict whether the husband or the wife would take the lead. Even when a couple wanted different things, the decision-making process did not automatically become a battle of wills where one person won and the other lost. The study found that simply having different preferences did not make a unilateral decision more likely.
The most significant finding, however, came from the group of women who were unsure of their husband's wishes. When a woman did not know if her husband wanted more children or fewer, the pattern of decision-making changed noticeably. In these cases, the couple was much more likely to report that they had made the decision together. The study calculated that for women who were uncertain about their partner's fertility preferences, the chance of a joint decision was higher than for those who knew their partner's mind. This suggests that when the future feels unclear, couples may lean on each other more, or perhaps they are more likely to discuss the issue openly to resolve the uncertainty.
Other factors also played a role in who made the decision. Women living in the region of Somalia, as opposed to Somaliland, were more likely to say the husband made the decision alone. Similarly, women from wealthier households were less likely to say the husband decided alone compared to women from poorer households. The age difference between spouses also mattered; when the husband was significantly older, the wife was less likely to say she made the decision alone. These details paint a picture of a society where geography, wealth, and age dynamics all weave into the fabric of reproductive choice.
Ultimately, this study suggests that the story of why contraception is not used in Somalia is not just about a lack of information or access to clinics. It is about the complex interplay between two people. The research indicates that when couples are unsure about each other's desires, they are more likely to make decisions together, perhaps because the uncertainty forces them to talk. Conversely, when partners disagree, it does not necessarily lead to one person dominating the other. The findings highlight that to understand reproductive health in this region, one must look at the couple as a unit, recognizing that the decision to have a child or to wait is often a shared conversation, even when the outcome is to not use birth control.
Drowning in papers in your field?
Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.