Explaining the gender gap in profits among entrepreneurs in Malawi
Using novel survey data from Malawi, this study finds that while male-owned businesses earn 120% higher profits than female-owned ones, the gender gap is primarily driven by caregiving responsibilities and capital access, though gendered workplace hostility significantly and disproportionately reduces profits for female entrepreneurs.
Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer
Imagine the economy as a giant, bustling marketplace where everyone is trying to sell something to make a living. In this marketplace, there's a long-standing mystery that economists have been trying to solve: why do some shopkeepers make significantly more money than others, even when they seem to be selling similar things? This question is a big deal in the field of development economics, which studies how countries grow and how people can escape poverty. To crack this code, researchers often use a tool called "decomposition." Think of decomposition like a chef breaking down a complex stew to figure out exactly which ingredients make it taste the way it does. They separate the "ingredients" (like how much money a business has to start with, or how many hours the owner works) from the "cooking skills" (how well the owner uses those ingredients). If one group of shopkeepers has less money or works fewer hours, that's an "ingredient" problem. But if they have the same ingredients as another group and still make less money, that suggests a "cooking skill" problem—or perhaps the kitchen itself is rigged against them. Understanding this difference is crucial because it tells us whether we need to give people more tools (like loans) or fix the rules of the game (like stopping discrimination).
In a recent study, a team of researchers decided to investigate this mystery in Malawi, a country in Southern Africa. They wanted to know why male-owned businesses were earning profits that were, on average, 120% higher than those of female-owned businesses. To get the answer, they didn't just guess; they went out and interviewed thousands of business owners in both cities and villages, asking detailed questions about their lives, their businesses, and even how they were treated at work.
The researchers found that the gap in profits wasn't just one thing; it was a mix of two main problems. First, there was the "ingredient" issue, which explained about 60% of the difference. The biggest ingredient missing for women was time. Female entrepreneurs were much more likely to be the primary caregivers for young children, leaving them with fewer hours to spend on their businesses. The second major missing ingredient was capital—money and assets like land or machinery to grow their shops. Women simply started with less.
However, the remaining 40% of the gap was the "cooking skill" or "kitchen rules" issue. This part of the gap wasn't about what the women had, but about how the world treated them and how they were able to use what they had. The study suggests that women faced a "structural disadvantage." Even when women had the same non-cognitive skills (like confidence, grit, and optimism) as men, those skills didn't translate into profits for them as strongly as they did for men. Furthermore, the study found that "gendered workplace hostility"—things like being treated differently, ignored, or even harassed because of one's gender—hurt women's profits significantly. While men might experience some of this hostility, it didn't seem to stop them from making money in the same way it did for women. Interestingly, the study also found that for the poorest female entrepreneurs, simply giving them more capital (money) might not fix the problem immediately because the "return" on that money was lower for them than for men, likely due to these other hidden barriers.
The researchers also looked at the data across different levels of wealth. They found that for the poorest women, the lack of capital was the biggest hurdle. But for the wealthier women, the problem shifted more toward the "structural disadvantage"—the unfair returns on their skills and the impact of workplace hostility.
So, what's the takeaway? The paper suggests that to help female entrepreneurs in Malawi succeed, we can't just hand them a loan. We need a two-pronged approach. First, we need to address the time crunch by supporting caregiving responsibilities, perhaps through community childcare or policies that help families share the load. Second, we need to tackle the invisible barriers: the workplace hostility and the social norms that prevent women from turning their hard work and smart ideas into actual profits. The study suggests that fixing these deep-rooted issues might be just as important as giving out money, because without a fair playing field, even the best ingredients won't make the stew taste right.
Drowning in papers in your field?
Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.