Competency-based optometry education in Nigeria: A qualitative study of the perspectives of students, lecturers, clinical leaders, and academic leaders

Imagine the world of training doctors and eye specialists as a massive, high-stakes cooking school. For a long time, these schools taught students by having them read every single cookbook in the library and memorize the ingredients list. The goal was to prove you knew the theory of a perfect steak. But in the real world, a chef doesn't just need to know what a steak is; they need to actually cook it without burning it, season it perfectly, and serve it to a hungry customer. This shift from "knowing the recipe" to "mastering the cooking" is called Competency-Based Education (CBE). It's a global movement where the focus isn't on how many years you sit in a classroom, but on whether you can actually do the job safely and well.

Now, imagine a country where the cooking school's official rulebook says, "We are a modern school! We teach real cooking!" But when you peek inside the kitchen, the students are still just reading cookbooks while the ovens are broken, and no one is actually letting them touch the food until the very last day. This is the puzzle researchers are trying to solve in Nigeria's optometry (eye doctor) schools. They want to know: If the schools say they are teaching "real skills," why do the students and teachers feel like they are still just memorizing facts? The answer matters because if future eye doctors aren't truly ready to fix eyes when they graduate, people in the community could lose their vision.

---

The Great "Cookbook vs. Kitchen" Disconnect

A team of researchers decided to investigate five different optometry schools in Nigeria to see what was really happening behind the closed doors of their classrooms and clinics. They didn't just look at the official rulebooks; they talked to 53 people, including students, teachers, clinic bosses, and school leaders. They used a special detective framework called the Structural-Functional Competency Alignment Framework (SFCAF). Think of this framework like a mechanic's checklist for a car. It checks if the structure (the engine, the wheels, the paperwork) matches the function (does the car actually drive?).

Here is what they found, and it's a bit of a plot twist.

The Paper's Main Finding:
The schools are like cars that look brand new on the outside but won't start. The researchers found that while the schools have all the right structures (the paperwork, the official curriculum, and the accreditation certificates saying they are "Competency-Based"), they are failing at the function (the actual teaching and testing). It's a case of "Structural-Functional Misalignment." In plain English: The schools have the idea of CBE, but they aren't actually doing it.

What the Paper Rules Out:
The researchers explicitly argue against the idea that this problem is because the teachers are unwilling to change. They found that the teachers want to teach properly, but the system is broken. It's not the chef's fault that the stove is missing; it's the school's fault for not buying a stove. The paper also rules out the idea that the students are failing because they aren't smart enough; the students are actually working harder than anyone else to fix the broken system.

How Sure Are They?
The authors are very confident in their conclusion that this gap exists. They didn't just guess; they interviewed people from five different schools across different regions of Nigeria, and the story was the same everywhere. They describe this as a "systemic failing," meaning the whole machine is broken, not just a few loose screws.

The Five Big Problems (The "Broken Stoves")

The researchers broke their findings down into five main themes, which we can think of as five different ways the cooking school is failing to teach real cooking.

1. The "Paperwork Promise" vs. The "Reality Check"
The school leaders told the researchers, "We are 80% to 90% aligned with the global standards!" They had the right committees and the right documents. But when the students and teachers spoke, they said, "No, we are still just sitting in lectures."

• The Analogy: It's like a gym that has a fancy sign saying "We offer Personal Training!" but when you walk in, the only thing they do is hand you a brochure about how to lift weights. The structure (the sign) is there, but the function (the training) is missing.
• The Glitch: The schools review their curriculum only every 4 to 5 years, and they don't have a way for students to give feedback while they are learning. It's like a restaurant that only asks customers for reviews after they've already left the country.

2. The "Lecture-Only" Trap and the "Hidden Curriculum"
The teaching method is still mostly lectures. The researchers found that for every 100 hours of training, about 70 hours are spent listening to a teacher talk, and only 30 hours are spent actually doing anything practical.

• The Analogy: Imagine learning to ride a bike by watching videos of people riding bikes for six years, and only getting on a real bike in the last year.
• The "Hidden Curriculum": Because the school isn't teaching them enough, students are secretly teaching themselves. They are using digital apps and sneaking into private clinics on their own time to practice. The researchers call this the "Hidden Competency Curriculum." It's a brilliant workaround by the students, but it's a problem because the school doesn't know they are doing it, so they can't grade it or make sure it's safe.

3. The "Test That Doesn't Test"
This is a big one. The schools are still testing students with written exams (multiple choice questions) instead of making them do the job.

• The Analogy: Imagine a driving test where you have to write an essay about how to parallel park, but you never actually get behind the wheel.
• The Reality: None of the five schools used real-world tests like OSCEs (where you examine a patient) or Mini-CEX (where a teacher watches you do a task). They are testing knowledge, not skill. The paper says this is a "structural failure" because you can't prove someone is ready to be an eye doctor just by seeing if they can pass a written test.

4. The "Broken Tools" and "Missing Teachers"
Even when the schools have the equipment, they often can't use it.

• The Analogy: It's like a school having a brand new, expensive microscope locked in a glass case because the key is lost, or because the school is afraid the students will break it.
• The Evidence: In one school, students said, "We had the equipment, but we did not have access to it." In another, there was only one full-time doctor to supervise a huge group of students. Also, the teachers themselves aren't getting trained on how to teach skills. They are learning on their own, which is like asking a chef to learn how to teach cooking by just reading a book, without ever going to a teacher's workshop.

5. The "Half-Ready" Graduates
Because of all the above, the students themselves feel only 50% to 80% ready to work on their own.

• The Analogy: It's like a pilot who has studied the flight manual for six years but has only flown the plane for the last two months. They feel okay for a short trip, but they are terrified of a storm.
• The Consequence: Everyone agrees that the real "training" happens after graduation, during the internship year. The university is basically sending out "half-baked" graduates and expecting the internship to finish the job. This puts patients at risk because the new doctors might not be ready for complex eye problems.

The Bottom Line

The paper concludes that Nigerian optometry schools are "CBE on paper, but not in practice." The gap isn't because anyone is trying to be bad; it's because the system is stuck in the past. The schools have the rules for modern cooking, but they haven't built the kitchen to cook the meal.

To fix this, the researchers suggest three big things:

1. Stop just reading the recipe: Schools need to actually test students by having them do the work (like OSCEs).
2. Fix the kitchen: Schools need to give students access to real equipment and real patients earlier in their training.
3. Train the chefs: Teachers need to be trained on how to teach skills, not just how to lecture.

The researchers warn that just buying new computers or fancy technology won't fix this if the teaching style stays the same. It's like buying a super-fast car but forgetting to put gas in it. The engine (the teaching) needs to change, not just the paint job. This story isn't just about eye doctors in Nigeria; it's a warning for any place trying to teach real-world skills using old-school methods.