Integrating constructivist and posthumanist approaches to address educational inequalities in accounting education for sustainable development in South African FET contexts
This qualitative multiple case study demonstrates that integrating constructivist and posthumanist approaches in South African Further Education and Training colleges enhances sustainable accounting competencies and ethical sensitivity through context-dependent project-based and community initiatives, while highlighting the need for systemic support to overcome resource disparities between urban and rural institutions.
Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer
In the classrooms of South Africa, the legacy of a divided past still shapes who gets to learn and how well they learn. For decades, the education system was built to serve some while leaving others behind, creating deep gaps in resources, infrastructure, and opportunity that persist today. Within this landscape, accounting is often seen as a rigid subject of numbers and rules, a technical skill set for managing money. However, a new perspective is emerging that views accounting not just as a calculation of profit, but as a practice deeply connected to people, communities, and the natural world. This shift relies on two main ideas. The first is that students learn best when they actively build their own understanding by solving real problems, rather than simply listening to lectures. The second is the recognition that human actions, including financial decisions, are inextricably linked to the environment and cannot be separated from it. When these ideas are combined, they offer a way to teach accounting that prepares students to be responsible citizens who understand the broader impact of their work. The question remains, however, whether such an approach can truly work in schools that lack basic resources, or if it is only possible in well-funded institutions.
Researchers set out to explore this question by looking at two different Further Education and Training colleges in South Africa. They chose one college located in a busy city and another in a remote rural area to see how the same teaching ideas played out in vastly different settings. The study involved thirty-one people, including teachers, students, managers, and community partners, who shared their experiences through interviews and observations. The researchers were looking for signs of a new way of teaching that blends active learning with an awareness of ecological and social responsibility. They wanted to know if students could learn to think critically about sustainability and if these methods could help bridge the gap between rich and poor schools.
What they found was a story of two very different realities. At the urban college, the environment was supportive of these new ideas. The classrooms were equipped with computers and reliable internet, and the school had strong connections with local businesses. Here, teachers were able to run a project where students analyzed the financial reports of a real manufacturing company. The students did not just look at the numbers; they examined the company's environmental impact, such as its carbon footprint and waste management. They worked together to connect the company's profits with its responsibility to the planet. The students reported that this experience opened their eyes, helping them see that accounting is about more than just balancing books; it is about making decisions that affect the community and the environment. They felt more confident and better prepared for the modern workforce.
In contrast, the rural college faced significant hurdles. The classrooms were crowded, computers were old and often broken, and the internet was unreliable. Teachers there wanted to use similar active learning methods, but the lack of resources made it nearly impossible to do the same kind of high-tech projects. Instead, they turned to what they had: their local community. Students organized workshops to teach financial literacy to people in nearby villages, helping them learn how to budget and save money. This approach was successful in its own way. The students gained confidence in speaking to others and realized the value of their skills in helping their neighbors. They felt a strong sense of purpose and saw how their work could make a difference in their own communities. However, they also expressed worry that they were not as well-prepared as their city counterparts for jobs that required advanced technology or connections to large businesses.
The study suggests that while new teaching methods can improve learning and build confidence in both settings, they cannot erase the deep structural inequalities that exist between them. The urban students had access to tools and partnerships that allowed them to engage with complex environmental and business issues directly. The rural students, despite their enthusiasm and the success of their community work, were limited by a lack of infrastructure and technology. The researchers found that the success of these innovative approaches depends heavily on the context in which they are used. What works in a well-resourced city school cannot simply be copied and pasted into a rural school without significant changes.
Ultimately, the paper argues that integrating these active and socially conscious teaching methods is a powerful way to educate future accountants, but it requires more than just good ideas. It demands that schools and policymakers address the unequal distribution of resources. To truly create a fair and sustainable education system, support must be given to under-resourced institutions so that students in rural areas can access the same opportunities for growth and professional readiness as those in the cities. Without this systemic change, the gap between the two types of schools will remain, no matter how innovative the teaching methods become.
Drowning in papers in your field?
Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.