← Latest papers
📄 medicine

“Recognise psychological trauma as much as physical”: Understanding birth-related trauma knowledge, experience, and educational needs in maternity staff

A mixed-methods study of 138 maternity staff reveals that while most have witnessed birth-related trauma, few have received formal training, highlighting an urgent need for accessible, comprehensive education modules that integrate trauma-informed care as a core competency and address clinician well-being.

Original authors: Maddie Power, Kerri M Gillespie, Tess Willis, Charlotte Scott, Grace Branjerdporn

Published 2026-10-05
📖 6 min read🧠 Deep dive

Original authors: Maddie Power, Kerri M Gillespie, Tess Willis, Charlotte Scott, Grace Branjerdporn

Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). ✨ This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

The journey from pregnancy to parenthood is often imagined as a time of pure joy, but for many, it is shadowed by a different kind of memory. Just as a severe physical injury leaves a mark on the body, a frightening or distressing birth experience can leave a deep emotional scar. This is known as birth-related trauma. It does not always happen because something went wrong medically; often, it stems from how a person was treated. If a woman feels unheard, rushed, or stripped of her ability to make choices about her own body, the event can become psychologically damaging. The impact is profound, affecting not only the mother's mental health and her bond with her baby, but also her willingness to have more children in the future.

Recognizing this pain is only the first step. The people on the front lines of maternity care—midwives, nurses, and doctors—are the ones who witness these events daily. They are also the ones who must help families heal. Yet, for a long time, the medical system has focused heavily on physical safety, often overlooking the emotional weight of the experience. There is a growing understanding that to truly care for a patient, a provider must be able to recognize psychological trauma just as clearly as a broken bone. But to do this, the caregivers themselves need to be equipped with the right knowledge and support. Without it, they may unintentionally cause more harm, or they may carry the heavy burden of their patients' pain without knowing how to set it down.

A team of researchers at the Mater Hospital in Australia set out to understand exactly where the gaps lie in this area of care. They wanted to know what healthcare staff already knew about birth trauma, what they had experienced, and what they needed to learn to do their jobs better. The team surveyed 138 staff members working in a large maternity unit, asking them about their professional roles, their past experiences with traumatic births, and their training history. They used a mix of standard questions and open-ended prompts, allowing the staff to speak freely about their concerns and desires for better education. The goal was not just to count numbers, but to listen to the voices of the people who work in the delivery rooms and postnatal wards, using their answers to design a future training program that would actually help them.

The results of the survey revealed a stark reality. Nearly nine out of ten staff members had witnessed a birth-related trauma at least once during their careers. For many midwives, this was not a rare occurrence; almost half reported seeing such events more than ten times in their professional lives. Despite this frequent exposure, the majority of the staff had never received any formal training on how to handle it. Less than one-third of the respondents had engaged in any professional development specifically focused on birth trauma. This created a situation where the people most likely to see the problem were the least prepared to address it. The staff expressed a strong desire to learn, but they wanted the training to be practical and accessible, preferring a mix of in-person sessions and online modules that could fit into their busy schedules.

When the researchers looked deeper into what the staff wanted to learn, a clear picture emerged. The most requested topics included how to provide care that is sensitive to past trauma, how to work with women who decline certain medical recommendations, and how to navigate complex situations involving consent. The staff were particularly concerned about the moments when a patient feels powerless. Several participants shared stories of witnessing colleagues perform procedures on women who had not given consent, or of seeing staff ignore a woman's request to stop. They wanted training that would teach them how to communicate respectfully, even in emergencies, and how to ensure that a patient's voice is heard. They also wanted to know how to support families who had experienced a traumatic birth, including those with babies in the neonatal intensive care unit, an area where the emotional toll is often overlooked.

Beyond the care of patients, the study highlighted a critical need to support the caregivers themselves. The staff described experiencing what is known as vicarious trauma, a form of emotional exhaustion that comes from repeatedly witnessing the distress of others. They spoke of feeling guilty, anxious, or burned out after difficult shifts, often without any institutional support to help them process these feelings. Many noted that they were left to figure out how to cope on their own. The survey showed a strong demand for training that included strategies for self-care, stress management, and structured debriefing sessions where teams could talk openly about difficult events. The staff recognized that if they are not supported, their ability to provide high-quality care diminishes.

The researchers also identified significant barriers within the hospital system that made it hard to provide good care. Staff members reported confusion about how to refer patients to mental health services, unclear pathways for support, and a lack of continuity in care due to shift rotations. They noted that trauma often reveals itself days or weeks after the birth, by which time the immediate postpartum support has ended, leaving families with nowhere to turn. There was also a concern that current screening tools, which often focus on depression, might miss women who are suffering from trauma but do not fit the standard criteria for a mental health diagnosis. The staff felt that the system was fragmented, making it difficult to provide the seamless, compassionate care that families need.

The study concludes that the solution lies in making trauma-informed care a core part of every healthcare provider's training, rather than an optional extra. The authors suggest that education needs to be embedded into the professional development of all maternity staff, from nurses to doctors. This education must be evidence-based, meaning it is grounded in solid research rather than guesswork, and it must address the specific needs of the workforce, including the emotional well-being of the staff. By recognizing psychological trauma as seriously as physical injury, and by giving the people who deliver care the tools and support they need, the medical system can begin to heal the deep wounds of birth. The path forward requires a shift in perspective, one that values the emotional safety of the patient and the resilience of the provider as equally important parts of a healthy birth experience.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →