When competence does not breed confidence: A systematic negative deviation from the global performance-confidence trend
Analyzing PISA 2022 data across 72 economies, this study reveals that while mathematics performance generally predicts self-efficacy, seven diverse systems exhibit a significant negative deviation where high achievement fails to translate into confidence, a pattern likely driven by standardized, examination-driven curricula rather than specific cultural or regional factors.
Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer
In the world of education, there is a long-held belief that skill and confidence grow together. When a student learns to solve a difficult problem, they naturally feel more capable of solving the next one. This feeling of capability, known as self-efficacy, is more than just a warm emotion; it is a practical engine that drives people to keep trying when things get hard, to choose challenging subjects, and to apply what they know to real-life situations. Without this confidence, even a highly skilled person might hesitate to use their talents. Researchers have long wondered why, in some places, students who are undeniably good at mathematics still report feeling unsure of their abilities. Is this a cultural trait, a result of how families raise children, or something about the schools themselves?
A new analysis of data from 72 different economies around the world has uncovered a striking pattern that challenges simple explanations. By looking at the scores of 15-year-olds on a major international math test and comparing them to how confident those students felt about their own math skills, researchers found that most places follow the expected rule: higher scores generally mean higher confidence. However, seven specific education systems break this rule in a dramatic way. In these places, students perform at the very top of the global rankings, yet their confidence levels are far lower than their test scores would predict. This gap is not a small statistical blip; it is a massive, consistent shortfall that appears in countries as diverse as Korea, Japan, Poland, and Latvia.
The study, which used data from the 2022 PISA assessment, began by mapping the relationship between math performance and self-belief across the entire globe. The researchers found a strong link: as a country's average math score goes up, the average confidence of its students usually goes up too. But when they looked closely at the data, seven economies stood out because their students were significantly less confident than the global trend suggested. These seven systems—Korea, Japan, Hong Kong, Chinese Taipei, Vietnam, Poland, and Latvia—produced students who could solve complex math problems with ease but who did not believe they could use those skills in everyday life, such as reading a train schedule or calculating a price with tax. The difference in confidence between these seven systems and the rest of the world was so large that it was statistically rare, appearing in only a tiny fraction of random groupings.
One of the most important findings of this research is what it rules out. For years, experts have suspected that this lack of confidence might be a specific trait of East Asian cultures or a result of the "Confucian heritage" found in many of these high-performing Asian nations. However, the data tells a different story. If culture were the sole cause, then other high-performing Asian systems like Singapore and Macao should show the same lack of confidence. They do not; their students are both high-achieving and highly confident. Furthermore, if the problem were unique to East Asia, then European countries should not be part of the group. Yet, Poland and Latvia, which have very different cultures and languages from their Asian counterparts, show the exact same pattern of high skill and low confidence. This suggests that the cause is not a specific cultural mindset or a region of the world, but rather a shared feature of how these schools are organized.
The common thread connecting these seven systems is a focus on standardized, high-stakes testing. In these places, the curriculum is tightly controlled, and success is often measured by how well students can perform on specific, difficult exams. The researchers suggest that this approach, while excellent at producing test scores, may inadvertently separate the ability to pass a test from the belief that one can apply knowledge in the real world. When students are trained primarily to follow strict procedures to get the right answer on a paper, they may not get enough practice in using those skills for authentic, messy problems. This disconnect creates a situation where students are technically competent but feel unprepared to act. The study also looked at whether family support might be the missing piece, but found that in these specific systems, the link between family encouragement and student confidence was no stronger than in other countries. This points the finger away from the home and toward the school environment as the place where the gap is formed.
The researchers were careful to note that this study describes a pattern across entire countries, not the experiences of individual students. It shows that a specific type of schooling system can produce a group of students who are skilled but hesitant. To close this gap, the analysis suggests that simply telling students to "be more confident" or "think positively" would not work. Instead, the data implies that students in these systems need repeated, real-world experiences where they successfully apply their math skills to practical problems and receive feedback that credits their own strategy. The study does not prove that a specific teaching method will fix the problem, but it identifies exactly where the problem lies: in the difference between knowing how to solve a problem on a test and believing you can use that knowledge in the world. The findings offer a clear target for educators and policymakers who want to ensure that high achievement is matched by the confidence to use it.
Drowning in papers in your field?
Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.