Rethinking the Link Between Gender Stereotypes and Sexist Attitudes
Contrary to dominant theories suggesting that gender stereotypes perpetuate inequality, this multinational research demonstrates that viewing women as more communal than men is actually associated with lower or similar levels of sexist attitudes compared to viewing both genders as equally communal.
Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer
For decades, social scientists have operated under a powerful assumption about how we view men and women. They believed that when people describe women as warm, nurturing, and focused on others, while describing men as independent, assertive, and focused on their own goals, these descriptions are the root of sexism. In this view, labeling women as "communal" and men as "agentic" was thought to trap women in a box that justified their lower status in society. It seemed logical: if we think women are naturally suited for caring roles and men for leadership roles, we might treat them differently and unfairly. This idea has shaped much of the research on gender inequality, suggesting that the very act of seeing women as kind and caring is what fuels prejudice against them.
However, two new studies by researchers at New York University Abu Dhabi challenge this long-held belief. By analyzing data from tens of thousands of people across dozens of countries, the authors found that the connection between these stereotypes and sexist attitudes is far more complicated than previously thought. Instead of confirming that seeing women as warm leads to sexism, the data suggests that people who hold these traditional views often score lower on measures of sexist belief than those who see men and women as exactly the same. The findings do not mean that gender inequality is gone or that stereotypes are harmless, but they do force a rethink of how those stereotypes actually work in the human mind.
The researchers began by gathering massive amounts of data to see what people actually believe. In their first study, they surveyed 7,001 people across 14 countries, ranging from highly egalitarian nations like Sweden to places with very different gender dynamics like Saudi Arabia and Egypt. In a second, larger study, they analyzed data from 33,313 people in 62 countries, mostly university students. In both cases, they asked participants to rate how much they agreed that certain traits belonged more to women, more to men, or equally to both. The traits fell into two main groups: communal qualities like being compassionate, patient, and sensitive, and agentic qualities like being ambitious, decisive, and independent.
As expected, the vast majority of people across the globe still hold the traditional view: they see women as more communal and men as more agentic. This pattern was consistent everywhere, from the United States to China. But the surprise came when the researchers looked at how these beliefs connected to sexist attitudes. They measured sexism in several ways, including beliefs that men are naturally superior, the denial that sexism exists today, and the idea that women should stick to traditional domestic roles. They also measured "benevolent sexism," which is a subtler form of prejudice that views women as needing protection or as morally superior, but still in need of men's guidance.
The results turned the old theory on its head. The researchers found that people who strongly believed women were more communal than men actually held fewer sexist views than those who believed men and women were equally communal. In other words, the people who most strongly endorsed the stereotype of the "warm woman" were often the least likely to say that women are inferior or that discrimination is a thing of the past. This was true for hostile sexism, which involves overt hostility toward women, and for the denial of sexism. The only exception was a specific part of benevolent sexism related to the idea that men and women are fundamentally different and complementary, but even there, the relationship was not the simple, direct link that earlier theories had predicted.
The researchers also looked at how people viewed agency, or the "doer" traits. They found that believing men are more agentic than women was linked to higher levels of sexism, which aligns with older ideas. However, the crucial finding was that the belief in women's communality did not drive these negative attitudes. In fact, the data suggested that when people saw women as communal, they did not necessarily see them as less capable or less deserving of rights. The study authors note that this might be because communality is a highly valued human trait. When people see women as warm and caring, they may be humanizing them rather than diminishing them, which could actually reduce the desire to discriminate against them.
This does not mean that gender stereotypes are harmless. The researchers point out that in specific situations, like the workplace, assuming a woman is communal can still lead to bias if the job requires aggressive or independent behavior. But on a broad, societal level, the idea that seeing women as warm is the primary engine of sexism appears to be incorrect. The data suggests that the most sexist attitudes are found among people who either see men and women as exactly the same in all traits, or who believe that men possess all the desirable qualities, including warmth.
The implications of this work are significant for how we understand gender inequality. For years, the focus has been on trying to convince people that women are just as capable and assertive as men, hoping that removing the "communal" label would fix the problem. These findings suggest that the solution might be more nuanced. It may not be about erasing the perception of women as caring, but rather about understanding why society often rewards "getting ahead" traits over "getting along" traits. The study suggests that the real source of inequality might lie in how our institutions are structured to value one set of traits over the other, rather than in the simple fact that we describe women as kind.
Ultimately, this research invites us to look closer at the stories we tell ourselves about gender. It shows that the human mind is capable of holding complex views where a woman can be seen as both warm and worthy of respect, without that warmth being used as an excuse for inequality. By moving beyond the assumption that stereotypes automatically lead to prejudice, we can begin to ask better questions about what truly drives gender bias and how we might build a society that values all human qualities, regardless of who possesses them.
Drowning in papers in your field?
Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.