← Latest papers
📄 social_science

Interdependent Sages are Capable of Object-Subject Reversal—with Dōgen and Barad

By synthesizing Dōgen's concept of continuous practice with Karen Barad's theory of agential cuts, this paper argues that true wisdom arises from the responsible capacity to enact "object-subject reversal," thereby transforming how subject-object distinctions are drawn to foster more inclusive modes of living.

Original authors: Chiara Robbiano

Published 2026-10-01
📖 6 min read🧠 Deep dive

Original authors: Chiara Robbiano

Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). ✨ This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

Imagine a world where the line between "you" and "the world" is not a fixed wall, but a line drawn in sand that can be washed away and redrawn. This is the starting point for a new way of thinking about wisdom, one that brings together two very different thinkers: a thirteenth-century Japanese monk named Dōgen and a contemporary physicist and philosopher named Karen Barad. For centuries, we have been taught to see the world as a collection of separate things: active people who think and decide, and passive objects like trees, mountains, or even other people who are just there to be used or observed. We assume that some beings have a voice and others do not. But what if this separation is not a fact of nature, but a habit of our own making? What if the ability to be wise depends on our capacity to break this habit and see the world differently?

This paper explores a profound question: How can a person become a sage? It does not look for a secret formula or a list of rules to follow. Instead, it argues that wisdom is an active, continuous process of changing how we interact with the world. By weaving together Dōgen's ancient insights on how all things are connected and Barad's modern ideas about how our actions shape reality, the author suggests that true wisdom lies in a specific kind of reversal. It is the ability to look at something we usually treat as a silent object—a tree, a river, a person with a disability, or a stranger—and recognize them as a subject with their own perspective, their own agency, and their own voice.

The journey begins with a simple observation about how we live. We constantly perform actions that shape our reality. When we walk through a forest, we might see it as a resource for timber, a scenic backdrop for a photo, or a home for wildlife. Each of these views is a practice, a repeated way of seeing and acting that brings a specific version of the world into existence. The paper draws on the concept of "dependent origination," an ancient idea that nothing exists in isolation; everything arises because of its connections to everything else. A fish is not a fish without water, and a bird is not a bird without the sky. Similarly, modern physics suggests that particles do not have fixed properties until they interact with something else. In this view, the world is not a stage with actors and props; it is a continuous flow of relationships where the "actors" and the "props" emerge together.

The author argues that because our reality is built through these repeated interactions, we have a responsibility for how we draw the lines between us and the rest of the world. We often draw a line that puts ourselves on one side as the active subjects and everything else on the other side as passive objects. This line is what the paper calls an "agential cut." It is a decision, often made without thinking, that determines who gets to speak and who is expected to listen. When we treat a person in a wheelchair as an object of pity, or a forest as a mere collection of trees, we are reinforcing a cut that excludes them from the conversation. We are deciding that they are not part of the "us" that shapes the future.

The paper suggests that wisdom is the courage to redraw this line. It uses a powerful example of children playing basketball. When a ball rolls toward a child in a wheelchair, the other children could simply invite him to watch or stand on the sidelines. But in a moment of true wisdom, they do something else. They realize that the current game excludes him not because of his body, but because of the rules of the game. So, they change the practice. They find toys with wheels for everyone to sit on, transforming the game so that the child in the wheelchair is not a spectator but a co-player. They do not just add him to the existing circle; they reshape the circle itself. This is what the author calls "object-subject reversal." It is the act of seeing someone or something not as a thing to be managed, but as a partner in creating the world.

This idea is not just about human relationships. The paper turns to Dōgen's writings, where he claims that "insentient beings"—things like trees, mountains, and rivers—speak the truth of the universe. To a modern ear, this might sound like a metaphor or a poetic fancy. But the author takes it seriously. Dōgen suggests that sages are those who can hear these voices. This does not mean that trees are whispering words in human language. It means that if we stop treating a tree as a silent object and start treating it as a subject with its own way of being, we can learn from it. We might learn how it responds to the wind, how it holds the soil, or how it exists in a web of life that we cannot see. The paper argues that this kind of listening requires a shift in our entire way of being. We cannot just use our minds to figure it out; we have to use our whole bodies to be present in a new way, dropping our old categories and expectations.

The author also brings in the work of Karen Barad, who shows that our scientific and social practices are not neutral. When we look at a fetus on an ultrasound screen, the way we see it—as a future person or as a biological object—changes the reality of the situation. It changes the rights and agency of the pregnant woman. The paper emphasizes that these cuts are not fixed. They are made by us, through our repeated actions, and they can be unmade and remade. The responsibility lies with us to notice when we are making a cut that excludes someone, and to have the courage to make a different one.

The paper concludes that being a sage is not about achieving a final state of perfection or knowing all the answers. It is about the continuous, daily practice of changing how we see and how we act. It is about recognizing that the world is a shared space where everyone and everything has a role to play. When we reverse the habit of seeing others as objects, we open the door to a world where no one is at the center, and where we all learn to live together in a way that allows everyone to flourish. The wisdom of the sage is the wisdom of the child who changes the game so that everyone can play. It is the understanding that the world is not a finished product, but a story we are writing together, and that every time we choose to listen to a voice we previously ignored, we change the story for everyone.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →